cinemaparadiso's blog http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso Broadcasting my thoughts Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:21:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 en hourly 1 Review: Slumdog Millionaire http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2009/01/26/review-slumdog-millionaire/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2009/01/26/review-slumdog-millionaire/#comments Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:06:56 +0000 Jahan Bakshi

All the talk of the film’s ‘poverty porn’ and obsession with garbage and faeces is just that- crap. Not nearly a masterpiece, Boyle’s film is uplifting, buoyant and celebrates life and Bollywood

Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM

Is there anything really left to say about Slumdog Millionaire? It’s been described in every way possible, from extraordinary to exploitative, from masterful to mundane. Slumdog Millionaire, to me hardly remains as much a film as it is a phenomenon, and admittedly it does feel silly adding my two insignificant cents to the million.

Well, if you ask me, here’s my humble take. Did I like it? Yes, very much so. But I would be lying if I said it blew me away, and even more so if I didn’t admit that I was a tad underwhelmed- but you could blame it on my great expectations from this Dickensian tale of adversity, adventure and unswerving love.

Danny Boyle brilliantly crafts this rags-to-riches tale treating the subject with humility, respect and dignity, immersing him in the milieu and yet maintaining his uniquely kinetic style without forcibly imposing a ‘foreign’ style on the film, and this is no ordinary achievement. Boyle’s enthusiasm and spirit is difficult to resist, and even harder not to admire.

This is undeniably a pure masala plot that feeds of the most classic of Bollywood themes, and I can’t help but wonder if the ingredients that make up this film would have been better handled in the hands of say, a Bhardwaj instead of a Boyle, of what a masterful Indian filmmaker could have made of this material… but well, I guess I’ll just let that thought be, for the rueful fact is that no big producer in India would touch this film with a bargepole.

Boyle, along with his exceptional cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle don’t look at slum life with lingering pity, instead what we get is a celebration of life and the sheer spirit to survive and win, against all odds. Set to AR Rahman’s music, the images create an oddly beautiful, even poetic landscape that throbs and pulsates with life.

Simon Beaufoy’s screenplay, skillfully adapted from Vikas Swarup’s novel Q&A is taut and never less than gripping, and while it might be easy to nitpick and point loopholes and accents, this is clearly not a film about the tiny details and complaining about them is pretty pointless. The English and Hindi mix is handled pretty darn well, especially in the first half, and while it compromises on the authenticity, the writers have clearly done their best. If there is a weak spot in the film, it would have to be the central love story which did not come across as affecting enough to me, and I would perhaps blame some of that on Frieda Pinto who came across as a little lackluster despite a reasonably attractive presence. The rest of the cast is pitch perfect- right from Dev Patel as the pure-hearted Jamal and Madhur Mittal as his street smart brother Salim to the other supporting players- Anil Kapoor, Irrfan Khan and Ankur Vikal.

But the actors who really shine and give the film its most touching and endearing moments are without doubt the youngest- Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail, Ayush Mahesh Khedekar, and Rubiana Ali who play Salim, Jamal and Latika in the earliest parts of the film- the innocence they bring to the film is undescribably incredible, and for me, these little unsung heroes alone warrant that you watch this film.

In the end- of course- it’s Danny Boyle, who like Jamal doggedly and devotedly jumps into a cesspool of s**t, and emerges wonderfully triumphant, even as some accuse him of ‘cheating’. And thus, even as Slumdog didn’t quite make it from exciting and compelling to exhilarating and magical for me- I don’t for a second grudge the film its glory. After all, maybe the answer behind its success is simply (d).

Destiny, that is.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2009/01/26/review-slumdog-millionaire/feed/
Review: Chandni Chowk to China http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2009/01/17/review-chandni-chowk-to-china/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2009/01/17/review-chandni-chowk-to-china/#comments Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:12 +0000 Jahan Bakshi Warner Bros.’ first big ticket Bollywood release makes you wonder what they were smoking when they approved this tedious mess
Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM

Dear Mr. Ghajini, if you are reading this, please consider my earnest plea. If you do have some special iron rod that can erase the last few hours (I don't remember the length of the film, but it felt like eternity) of my memory, please come and bonk me hard on the head with it and I promise I would be forever in your debt.

Don't be mistaken folks, for I am no masochist. I have just had the misfortune of seeing Nikhil Advani's punishing disaster of a film, and I have to say I haven't felt such an unbearable urge to run out of the theatre in a long, long time.

The concept of Chandni Chowk to China apparently sprung from its teaser poster- Rohan Sippy showed Akshay Kumar the poster featuring him in a Chinese robe, carrying a sword-kebab, and decided to develop a script from the concept. He should really have stopped right there.

For if there is one thing that Chandni Chowk To China does successfully, it is reinforcing the fact that ultimately, the script is king. An Anees Bazmee may be able to pull off the sheer badness and crudeness of a film like Singh Is Kinng and turn it into a success, but Nikhil Advani is clearly a much more polished craftsman, and it is no surprise that he doesn't quite know what to make of this material, or the sheer lack of it. Having said that, the writing here (surprisingly by Shridhar Raghavan along with Rajat Arora) is such an incoherent mess, that it almost makes Singh Is Kinng seem worth studying in film school.

Terribly paced, Chandni Chowk To China moves so arbitrarily and randomly that none of the characters are established well enough for them to form any emotional connect with the audience. Even that could perhaps have been forgiven, if the film didn't take itself so seriously. Not content with being a zany, spoofy comedy (in which case it might have even worked) it expects us to be involved with unbelievably lame attempts at drama and ultimately amounts to pure emotional atyachar. The masala mix that CC2C may have sounded on paper, translates as bland and boring on screen.

Even the much-hyped action fails to excite despite a few well-staged sequences, and the overtly flashy editing often dilutes the impact of action, as it often does here. Himman Dhamija's cinematography is vibrant and fetching, and the fact that the film's technical team has clearly put effort in it is heartbreaking, for how painful it is to see good work gone waste.

The acting isn't exactly awful- Akshay Kumar is admirably enthusiastic considering the fact that another actor might have become tired of doing roughly the same role for what seems like the millionth time now, and Deepika Padukone while lacking personality, admittedly does a great job in the kick-a** department. But the actor who really seems to be having a blast here is legendary Chinese star Gordon Liu, who plays the archetypal cardboard bad guy with a relish that's difficult to resist.

Nikhil Advani is much smarter than this film, and his attempts to cater the lowest common denominator in this film fail miserably, only making it more tedious than it already is- here's hoping that he finds a script soon that he can do justice to, as well as one that justifies his presence.

The film ends with the scary prospect of a sequel (set in Africa, no less), and on that dreary note, I invoke thy name once again, Mr. Ghajini- and fervently beseech you to also pay the producers of this expensive mistake a visit in due course. Surely you can spare us from more of this Chinese torture.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2009/01/17/review-chandni-chowk-to-china/feed/
Review: Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/12/15/review-rab-ne-bana-di-jodi/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/12/15/review-rab-ne-bana-di-jodi/#comments Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:57:14 +0000 Jahan Bakshi

Aditya Chopra’s latest doesn’t disappoint- and brings back the magic to Yash Raj Films

Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM


I walked into the movie hall, the same two questions that made me, and perhaps, many others so eager to watch Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi was bouncing and ricocheting in my head with alarming velocity. Will Aditya Chopra pull it off superbly? Or will he botch it up unforgivably?

I was convinced the answer could lie only at one of the two extremes- and why not? This is Aditya Chopra’s first film after eight years, and this film had to be big- even if it meant a gargantuan disappointment- something we have almost come to take for granted from the Yash Raj banner of late.

Well, you know what? Aditya Chopra just managed to pull the carpet from under my feet. And while this review may make some feel like the subsequent ‘fall’ has made me lose my head, frankly, my dear- I don’t give a damn if this Rabs them the wrong way.

Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi isn’t even a 'great' film, but it gave me a feeling I had long forgotten- of soaring out of the theatre, having watched a film that swept me off and won me over, so much that I didn’t really care to nit-pick. Now that is precisely what ‘Yash Raj films’ were meant to do in the first place, isn’t it?

Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi does just that. I didn’t care that it was overlong, or that it was packed with those terribly cheesy references to the banner’s own films and more than a dozen of those syrupy scenes. All I know is that it was a jolly good Yash Raj Film, one that finally left me feeling really good. For that simple fact, I think it needs to be loved for just what it is, quite like its immensely endearing lead character.

And what a lead character- Surinder Sahni is as hard not to like as WALL-E- one look into his eyes, and your heart melts. It’s difficult not to feel for Suri as this unattractive, timid, bespectacled bloke earnestly yearns for his wife’s elusive love. He wants her so much that he transforms himself into another person, but will she ever love him for what he really is?

The much-guarded story of RNBDJ was leaked quite a while back- and yes, it pretty much plays out the way you heard it- Mr. Sahni becomes Raj Kapoor and plays the double role of husband and dance-partner, and yes, the wife never spots the difference. While it sounds implausible, it’s really a tale about multiple identities, suppressed desires, marital incompatibility and above all- pure love- that almost verges on magic realism. The strokes, expectedly though are pretty broad- and while I would be kidding myself if I expected finer details and nuances in this movie- but RNBDJ also often surprised me with its depth, something that Chopra did earlier this year too, in the much lighter and sillier Bachna Ae Haseeno which he wrote.

It all works, through all the hiccups and howlers, simply because at its center lies a rare honesty and an all rounder charmer called Shah Rukh Khan. As Suri, he wonderfully creates an instantly lovable, relatable and real hero, and how you root for the proverbial guy with a heart of gold. And as Raj Kapoor, he is equally delightful, as he mocks and lampoons himself with wry disdain, strutting around in those tight, colorful t-shirts and denims- totally unafraid of making a fool of him - and in the process, he and Chopra have fun deconstructing and reinventing the ‘Raj’ persona. Shah Rukh constantly treads a fine line, making Suri extraordinary and special within his ordinary exterior, precariously balancing flair with restraint, and yet he goes out on a limb to give us a really good time without making a big deal or ham sandwich of it.

Meanwhile, Anushka Sharma makes for a very believable Punjabi kudi, and compliments are in order for sheer confidence, strong screen presence and a dazzling smile- as Taani, she does an admirable job of creating empathy for a character who’s not really particularly well written. And here is a ‘virginal’ Yash Raj heroine who shouts ‘b**ch!’ without as much as a twitch, as she makes a bike swerve with astonishing spunk and verve. Dhoom to that, I say.

Yes, there’s a terribly gimmicky and needless Bollywood-through-the-ages song (with the customary guest appearances) that Farah Khan has done earlier and better. Yes, the music reaches a crescendo ever too often, and while decent, it could have been better. Yes, it occasionally lays it on real thick with emotion and endless talk about tujhme/usme/kisme Rab dikhta hai. And yet, for those 2 hours and 40 minutes I was pretty enthralled, and what’s more- I enjoyed a Hindi movie in a way that I had not in a long time- elated, enraptured and exhilarated.

I won’t go into details and spoil it for you. Watch it, make sure you watch it with your heart, and more likely than not, you’ll love it. And for once, I won’t be cringing when I see a big Bollywood film become a super-hit. That's why I'm going to really stick out my neck here- simply because, yes, Messrs Chopra- this time, I think you’ve really earned it.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/12/15/review-rab-ne-bana-di-jodi/feed/
Review: Oye Lucky Lucky Oye http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/12/02/review-oye-lucky-lucky-oye/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/12/02/review-oye-lucky-lucky-oye/#comments Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:02:20 +0000 Jahan Bakshi
Dibakar Banerjee’s Oye Lucky Lucky Oye is pitch perfectOriginally published on NOWRUNNING.COM

Yes, Dibakar Banerjee has done it again. It was always going to be tough to beat that terrific debut called Khosla Ka Ghosla- an unforgettable gem of a film that admittedly occupies a place in my favorite movies list. Oye Lucky Lucky Oye may not be as memorable as that charming dramedy, but it is as brilliant, and perhaps a far more complex and layered film.

Make no mistake- while the laughs do keep rolling steadily thanks to the engaging and superbly witty dialogue, what strikes more potently than anything is the dormant sadness within this film. Like its title
character, at the surface OLLO may seem all smooth, sharp and happy-go-lucky, but at the heart of it
all lies a quiet but unmistakable aching melancholy. Maybe its also all the darkness and sadness that surrounds us today in real life that made me connect more to OLLO’s serious, even tragic crux than it’s hilarious crust.

OLLO is a richly textured parable about a lower middle class boy and his unswerving ambition to make it to or break into the nouveau riche, and Dibakar Banerjee’s thoroughly real characters and inspiring
attention to detail gives an amazingly slice-of-life feel to the film. Karthik Vijay’s cinematography along with the excellent costume design and art direction makes each frame and surrounding come alive. The
subtly depicted emotional turmoil and the expertly portrayed social portrait of an emerging class war makes Lucky’s journey thoroughly compelling, and while the story of the film may seem one-note to some, it is frankly anything but that.
Banerjee also ups the style and slickness quotient with OLLO, and I thoroughly enjoyed his use of music and wonderfully stylized sequences in the film.

Abhay Deol couldn’t be better cast in this role of a superchor with the face of a saint, and he turns in a splendidly understated and nuanced performance, one that holds our attention throughout without
ever calling for it. This is a star turn, and Deol infuses Lucky with rare vulnerability and charm, making us root for the lovable thief all the way. The supporting cast is sparkling too, and while Paresh Rawal
is an obvious joy to watch as he creates three wonderfully quirky characters, Neetu Chandra stuns with her attractive, graceful presence- she is definitely a talent to look out for.

OLLO is definitely one of the best films I’ve seen this year and in a long time, and it’s a real pity that it arrives amongst us amidst some of the darkest and saddest times in India and the world- a time when I admittedly couldn’t even enjoy the film fully. Here’s ending this review with a prayer for peace, and with the hope that life comes back to ‘normal’ soon- despite knowing that our lives may never be the same again. After all, in life as in films, the show has to go on…


]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/12/02/review-oye-lucky-lucky-oye/feed/
Mumbai: Shocked, stunned, shaken http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/27/mumbai-shocked-stunned-shaken/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/27/mumbai-shocked-stunned-shaken/#comments Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:48:08 +0000 Jahan Bakshi

The chill refuses to leave my spine.

The horrifying images keep replaying in my head.

The heart weeps.

What has happened today in Mumbai is abominable, and words fail to describe the sheer scale of the tragedy. Mumbai, my heart and prayers are with you. May all those innocent people who have lost their lives rest in peace and those who have to deal with the loss find the strength to do so.

Amen.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/27/mumbai-shocked-stunned-shaken/feed/
Review: Yuvvraaj http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/22/review-yuvvraaj/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/22/review-yuvvraaj/#comments Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:08:00 +0000 Jahan Bakshi

Yuvvraaj sees Subhash Ghai go for a six
Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM

 

How the mighty have fallen. Really.

 

I sincerely hope Yuvvraaj is the last film we see from Subhash Ghai. While it almost seems cruel to write off the 'showman' in such a callous, even seemingly casual fashion, my words, I assure you aren't without reason.

 

Ghai may not have been a true master filmmaker ever, but he sure knew well how to make his kind of cinema, and he made it with a grand enthusiasm and fervor which was uniquely his own. But the admirable conviction of the showman, struggling to keep pace with changing times has become increasingly misplaced- and if his recent films-Yaadein, Kisna and Black And White (not nearly as bad as the last two, but inexcusably tepid) weren't sad proof enough, Yuvvraaj drives the point home. Real hard.

 

Midway through Yuvvraaj, my friend wondered aloud whether the second half would bring some respite from the agony. And pat came the answer, in Zayed Khan's faux drunken drawl-

'Forget it, it's all over.'

 

You know Ghai's really gone for a six with Yuvvraaj (no pun intended) as soon as the first song plays on screen. While this is probably one of AR Rahman's weakest and least memorable film scores, Ghai kills it completely on screen with horrid picturisation filled with tacky computer graphics and unbelievably random, disjointed and thoroughly limp visuals. For perhaps the first time ever, I saw Subhash Ghai not knowing what to do with a song, unable to capture it onscreen.

 

Ghai's Desi musical Rain Man is sheer unbearable pain, man. Honestly, just about the only thing overwhelming about Yuvvraaj is its sheer badness. It's muddled, gaudy, pretentious, terribly acted and hands down, the worst film of the year and I say this with confidence, despite the fact that 2008 isn't even over yet. And while it must have made poor old Beethoven do somersaults in his grave, trust me when I say- that is the least of the film's problems.

 

For a film so over the top- a pack of wolves stare at you from a painting as relatives straight from a Balaji soap plot havoc- Yuvvraaj is starved of any genuine drama or emotional heft, even of the most shamelessly melodramatic kind. That the actors in the film (with the sole exception of Anil Kapoor who turns in a respectable act, even if he hardly resembles an autistic person) are thoroughly incapable of dramatic performances doesn't really help.

 

Salman's endless goofball antics tire, while Katrina looks exquisitely pained playing the cello beside the fire. Seriously speaking, Zayed Khan is perhaps the actor I enjoyed watching the most in this film, for he at least brought temporary relief in this lurid cinematic nightmare- his superb albeit unintentional comic timing keeps you chuckling once in a while.

 

Yes, that's perhaps all the entertainment you can expect in this film that is filled with so much sound and fury signifying nothing, it can only be described as an assault on one's senses and sensibilities. And hence, to conclude- while it would indeed be sadden me to see Ghai end his directorial career having stumbled so spectacularly- I still hope this is his last film. Because while a pessimist may think that things can't get any worse than this, an optimist knows they can.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/22/review-yuvvraaj/feed/
Review: Dostana http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/15/review-dostana/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/15/review-dostana/#comments Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:08:55 +0000 Jahan Bakshi Karan Johar’s latest production trades the ‘K’ factor for the Gay factor- not that it makes much of a difference
Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM

The evidently heterosexual male protagonists in Karan Johar's films (produced or directed), to me, have also always in a sense seemed suspiciously like closet homosexuals. Take, for instance- Shah Rukh Khan and Hrithik Roshan looking like pretty pansies in transparent georgette and tight fitted leather respectively in Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, SRK and Saif Ali Khan making Preity Zinta look like a thorn among roses in Kal Ho Naa Ho, or even more recently (well, again) SRK playing the borderline emasculated Dev Saran in Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna.

This time Johar takes self-referencing to a new high and stretches the Kantaben joke into a whole film, and hence now we have Dostana, a film rich in unique irony. For a film that bases its very premise on two apparently straight men (The film attempts to drive in the point right at the beginning by making a smoldering Shilpa Shetty throw herself with, well- gay abandon at the two guys before they wake up in bed with two other hotties, so that we get an idea of how 'macho' and 'heterosexual' they are) pretending to be a couple, the film always makes an extra effort to keep the G factor at a safe distance, so that there is always a clear distinction between the normal and the 'other'. Ironic, because Johar's films have, as I said earlier, in a sense almost blurred the lines between gay and straight.

And also because, the way I see it, this is a film about two gay men who pretend to be straight pretending to be gay. Okay, I realize this is getting a bit convoluted for comfort.

Nevertheless, while this is an innocuous piece of fluff, which could do without needless over-analysis by yours truly- one wishes it was a little less shallow and regressive and perhaps a tad more bold and balanced. While it's distractingly good looking (Cinematographer Ayananka Bose knows the ol' razzle dazzle very well), so much so that even if you do get bored, you'd find it difficult to notice, the only thing that really comes off well in this film is Abhishek Bachchan.

Now, he may- unlike Chopra and Abraham- lack that unbelievably hot bod and bottom to lovingly be caressed by Bose's lens shot after shot, but the man has grown into an assured, confident performer who has the ability to make the audience let its hair down with him, as he displays great comic flair and gladly makes an endearing fool of himself on screen.

To be fair, John Abraham and Priyanka Chopra also prove to be rather likeable and nicely restrained on screen, and I guess one can't complain much about the outfits or the lack of them, especially when both of them look like a zillion bucks set afire. It is rather alarming however to witness Abraham's miniscule boxers deliberately slipping off with a frequency that rivals that of the pallus of the Cleavage Kumaris of yore. Butt of course; if you have it, I guess you might as well flaunt it.

What is unforgivable is, of course the sheer wastage of actors as talented as Sushmita Mukherjee, Kirron Kher and Boman Irani. While Kher's sensitivity and motherly warmth and Mukherjee's priceless
Monroe pose wins us over, Boman Irani scores no points for his ridiculous, loud and downright offensive cameo- the kind of role that he (or anyone) shouldn't touch by a bargepole. Bobby Deol meanwhile looks like he's on an extra shot of tranquilizer.

To be fair, there are times where the film does try to be progressive and the humour is genuinely good hearted, like the scene where Kirron Kher decides to accept her son's choice of groom and even proceeds to instruct John to keep a Karva Chauth ka vrath. But then you have those outrageous and flagrant predatory queen characters lead by the insufferable Irani featuring in scenes that are horrific to say the least. Boman Irani dancing to Beedi Jalaile and virtually molesting Abhishek Bachchan- find it funny, honey?

What we have finally is a film that is kabhi funny, kabhi uncomfortably squishy and squirmish, decently entertaining all through until it turns floppy and soppy and finally fizzles out faster than Diet Pepsi with a lame end that just makes you wonder: When will mainstream Indian cinema actually Kome out of the Kloset?

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/15/review-dostana/feed/
Review: Fashion http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/15/review-fashion/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/15/review-fashion/#comments Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:50:36 +0000 Jahan Bakshi Fashion is eminently watchable, but is also more pretentious than the industry it tries to ‘expose’
Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM

I have to confess that Madhur Bhandarkar’s latest feature has left me with strangely mixed feelings. While Bhandarkar’s hard-hitting, but often tacky filmmaking style acquires a much needed layer of polish, all the gloss on display also somehow results in Fashion being a far less moving, affecting or even unsettling watch when compared to his earlier body of work. Though a far better film than the shoddy and crude Traffic Signal, it grips for the most part but totally fails to touch you deeply.

Fashion tells the story of Meghna Mathur (Priyanka Chopra), an aspiring model from Chandigarh who comes to Mumbai to make it big in the glamorous field. She is naïve, but also tremendously ambitious- in a scene, when asked if she wants to become a model, she confidently asserts: ‘Model nahi, Supermodel’. (Not just a model, a Supermodel.) The film follows her ascent to fame and success as she becomes a ‘Supermodel’, transforming from a timid, innocent girl to an arrogant, street-smart woman, almost a manipulative shrew, and then her consequent fall from (dis)grace.

Kangana Ranaut plays Shonali Gujral, the edgy and unhinged reigning ’showstopper’ supermodel who is usurped by Meghna, and sinks deeper and deeper into a hellhole of self destruction, while debutante actress Mughda Godse plays Janet Sequeira, the tough minded but good hearted ‘B-grade’ model who’s been-there-done-that but not quite tasted success. While their characters are pivotal to the script, Bhandarkar makes it amply clear that this is Chopra’s film, and she grabs all the film’s screen time and attention.

As a result, Ranaut’s character is given particularly short shrift, as she remains a sketchy picture, mostly reduced to a showcase for Bhandarkar’s typical real life ‘inspirations’ (Join the dots: wardrobe malfunction, drug addiction). Ranaut can’t rise above these huge limitations that the script saddles her with, but to her credit, she still manages to evoke pathos and once in a while, we do see her natural talent shining through. Godse on the other hand plays her character with assured confidence and grace, and comes off as rather impressive for a first-timer.

Some of the problems with most of Bhandarkar’s films remain: Despite all the research, the film’s portrayal of the Fashion industry is often simplistic and over the top, and is far for completely convincing- in fact even the lead character hardly seems to be ’struggling’ her way to the top. Bhandarkar is also guilty of cramming clichés into the script as he can’t quite resist making Fashion an ‘exposé’ on the industry, and his so-called ‘revelations’ are mostly tired and silly. Besides, the script is sadly bereft of any strong tension or drama, and in a story like this, this is disappointing indeed. However, Bhandarkar does avoid being judgmental (at least overtly) in the film on various issues, and it is refreshing that the characters are not portrayed as victims of circumstances and exploitation, but of their own conscious choices and reckless ambition. The supporting cast also performs admirably, and holds the film together well; though the relationships are not as well defined as in Page 3 and the gay stereotypes do begin to grate quite often.

The buck of course, stops at Priyanka Chopra, and she turns in a solid performance that is definitely her best so far. She holds the screen and our attention and goes through her character graph with spunk, and lends empathy to her character. Right from the body language and the weight gain/loss, she has clearly given the film her all, but Chopra fails to translate the kind of raw viscerality onscreen that makes a truly great performance. The film drags in the second half and the actress can’t prevent you from yawning as Fashion teeters painfully towards its (nicely done) dramatic climax.

But for all I may complain about Bhandarkar, his brand of cinema or his latest film, you have to give it to him- he has made yet another commercial yet uncompromisingly woman-oriented film, and turned that dreaded ‘feminist’ genre into a successful line of films. And even if nothing else, for making films about women and managing to pull the crowds to actually see them, I grudgingly doff my hat to you, Mr. Bhandarkar.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/11/15/review-fashion/feed/
Review: Welcome To Sajjanpur http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/09/20/review-welcome-to-sajjanpur/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/09/20/review-welcome-to-sajjanpur/#comments Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:42:37 +0000 Jahan Bakshi

Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM 

Bhelcome, o, bhelcome- all you sajjan members of the audience. Benegal Babu's latest phillum is one rather unsatisfying chillum and leaves one with mixed feelings, as by its end it clearly overstays its bhelcome. Welcome To Sajjanpur is that breeze of fresh air that doesn't quite blow you away.

What it's about: The film is a social satire set in a quaint North Indian village with its unique bunch of colorful characters- or as many may argue- caricatures. The film unfolds through the eyes of Mahadev (played by Shreyas Talpade), an aspiring novelist, who being the only literate individual in the hamlet earns a living by writing eloquently worded letters for the many illiterate people in the village. The film and its characters thus unfold through the protagonist's bittersweet encounters with them.

What didn't work: Okay, bad things first. There's not much of a story here, in the first place, and the film depends almost totally on its characters, most of which are hardly memorable or exceptionally performed. The satirical yarn is more preachy than sharp, and at nearly three hours, it clearly begins to descend into tedium. Perhaps the makers realized this, and hence we have an abruptly wrapped up end that leaves us even more dissatisfied. Shantanu Moitra's music, barring the peppy and upbeat Sitaram number, is tepid and eminently forgettable, besides the fact that the listlessly picturised songs only hamper the narrative. The film also often feels oddly staged and the writing very play-like, and while this may be deliberate, it somehow doesn't really work. But the main flaw here is the screenplay, which meanders way too much into fickle subplots, many of which are pretty pointless.

What worked: Shreyas Talpade. The actor mostly reduced to playing sidekicks finally gets his due in a film again after Iqbal and Dor, and he doesn't disappoint. Talpade is endearing and earnest and he is definitely the glue that keeps you on your seat and the disjointed screenplay from falling apart totally. Writer Ashok Mishra may have faltered otherwise, but he writes with an assured hand, and his dialogues even when risqué have an old-world charm and a nice, understated quality to them except when they preach too blatantly. Of the supporting cast, watch out for Ravi Jhankal who is clearly the standout in the supporting cast for his stellar and spirited portrayal of the feisty eunuch Munnibai. While it lacks it depth or coherence, Welcome To Sajjanpur is clearly both well intentioned and socially responsible, both salient features of all of Shyam Benegal's films.

Bottom line: People expecting too much out of Shyam Benegal, considering his past body of work are bound to be disappointed. Still, the weight of expectation aside, Welcome To Sajjanpur is not a bad watch- it's honest cinema that's rare to come by these days, even if it is ultimately deeply flawed.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/09/20/review-welcome-to-sajjanpur/feed/
Review: The Last Lear http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/09/14/review-the-last-lear/ http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/09/14/review-the-last-lear/#comments Sun, 14 Sep 2008 07:18:01 +0000 Jahan Bakshi

For better or for worse- presenting a review of Rituparno Ghosh’s new film in verse

Originally published on NOWRUNNING.COM 

To B, or not to B- that is the question. For just about everything that is good or bad (depending on your viewpoint, and your aptitude and appetite for Shakespeare) about Rituparno Ghosh's first English language feature The Last Lear- inspired by Utpal Dutt’s play Aajker Shahjahan- is effectively encapsulated in its wildly eccentric lead character Harish a.k.a Harry Mishra, played with matchless majesty by Amitabh Bachchan.

It's grand and whimsically theatrical, but also often very inaccessible and vague. It is overwhelming in personality but feels confusing in terms of character. And it leaves you as compelled and intrigued as it leaves you baffled and mystified.

So while all the soliloquy spouting leaves me a tad doubting- whether or not it has any meaningful relevance to the plot; at the very outset, I must confess- my thorough lack of Shakespearean prowess. Imagine my plight when I realized I ain’t quite erudite. (The blame for this must go to the CBSE- alas, they don’t think the Bard is worth discussing in English class.) And hence, rather than be a dumb mouth and pour portentousness and pretense from my ruby lips, I honestly and humbly ask for forgiveness from Mishraji, Shakespeareji and Ghoshji who shalt perhaps scoff at me for my ignorance, for them have I offended.

However, even whilst coming to more familiar cinematic ground, the film's not without its foibles. The film is unnecessarily plodding on the pretext of being art, and how one wishes the storytelling were a tad more sharp and tart. The dialogue is often more stiff than Sunny Deol's dancing, and though it might be amusing to hear Ms. Zinta and Ms. Shah bickering, it often seems that the film's focus, like Mr. Mishra's vision, is flickering. Add nurse Ms. Dutta and it seems like the paralyzed lead character is going to get no patta.

Still, overt ambiguity, and unsatisfactorily explained plot points aside, there still is enough to savor in this film that is audacious enough to have its lead character scoff at its own medium. There are moments of fine humor aplenty, and then there are some that stun with their intensity and sheer cathartic strength. All of this is captured exceptionally by Abhik Mukhopadhyay, though the excessively nicotine stained lens often irritate you eye.

And the performances make sure that this Lear Express never runs out of steam. Shefali Shah gives a strong performance and Preity Zinta is a revelation, showing surprising maturity; Divya Dutta on the other hand just ends up silly, and that's a real pity. If there's a weak link here at all, it's the rather limited Mr. Rampal- Anne Robinson would agree. Till he's playing Mr. Goody Two Shoes, he's nice- but when it comes to portraying complex shades, he's like a Tandoori murga without spice.

But the despite some meandering subplots that cause you to groan, it's still the Big B who occupies the throne. It may not be his greatest act ever, but his potent renditions do make you shiver- and this remark I confirm, is meant purely as a compliment. One may complain that one never really manages to totally understand Harry Saab- but he is meant to be an enigma and a legend- and it is then, perhaps apt that he is not an open kitaab. Bachchan plays to the gallery with extraordinary power and delight, and it is a relief that he doesn't scream and beseech us to 'come into the light.' So while reading sad attempts at cornball poetry might not be your thing, Lear or not- Bachchan in The Last Lear is clearly the King.

]]>
http://blogs.rediff.com/cinemaparadiso/2008/09/14/review-the-last-lear/feed/