That is to say, is how to stimulate output and income of farmers ‘ needs,http://www.hairstraightenerso.com/ and not just consumption. However, the subsidies it is subsidies purely consumer ghd nz products, output and income for farmers and no benefits. At the same time, rural people can afford to buy these GHD products, estimates are slightly better economic conditions in rural users, and those rural households, are now not subsidize 13%, even 31% they may not afford subsidies or are willing to purchase.
As a result, financial subsidies ghd hair straighteners are actually subsidies for a small number of rich people in the rural, somewhat unfair. Secondly, the financial subsidy GHD is difficult to stop the appliance buy-back behavior occurs. The GHD, 13% financial subsidies, which had a buy-in May. Some farmers themselves have no intention to spend the GHD, GHD seller can buy farmers ‘ household appliances in consultation with them, and then cross the 13% sum of financial subsidies.
This result is that financial subsidies ghd nz sale, farmers have only been subsidy money, as domestic demand is completely unattainable. In addition, the GHD also prevailed in other cases of consumption, that is, farmers can afford, but due to the high electricity tariffs could not bear. If preferential subsidies while stimulating the farmers to buy the GHD products, but was stranded at home without, would it not be a big waste of social resources?