Setting up a landmark judicial precedence in the matters of Gorige Pentaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others (2008) 12 SCC 531, the Hon. Apex court has significantly observed with the order of quashing the impugned criminal complaint FIR that ” when the basic ingredients of the offence are missing in the complaint, then permitting such a complaint to continue and to compel the appellant to face the rigmarole of the criminal trial would be totally unjustified leading to abuse of process of law.”
Archives
Blogroll
Recent Posts
- SC: “Right to sleep is a Fundamental Right. To disturb sleep is a violation of Human Right.”
- Bombay High Court questioned “Anna Hazare’s Stir as interference with functioning of the Parliament ?”
- No Revenue Authority can ignore even a Kaccha Entry : Gujarat High Court
- In absence of allegations that applicants at the relevant time were in day to day affairs & management of the accused Company in a complaint, the applicants cannot be held vicariously liable under Sec: 141 of NI Act
- “Absence of basis ingredients of offence in a complaint justifies quashing of such complaint” : SC
Tags
Add new tagFriends' Update
-
Loading ...Please wait..