Numerology
Numerology refers to any of many systems, traditions or beliefs in a mystical or esoteric relationship between numbers and physical objects or living things.
Numerology and numerological divination were popular among early mathematicians, such as Pythagoras, but are no longer considered part of mathematics and are regarded as pseudomathematics by most
scientists. This is similar to the historical development of astronomy out of astrology, and chemistry from alchemy.
Today, numerology is often associated with the occult, alongside astrology and similar divinatory
arts. The term can also be used for those who, in the view of some
observers, place excess faith in numerical patterns, even if those
people don’t practice traditional numerology. For example, Underwood Dudley uses the term to discuss practitioners of the Elliott wave principle of stock market analysis.
Number definitions
Definitions of the various digits vary widely among practitioners. Common examples include:

* 0. Everything and nothing. The All
* 1. Individual. Aggressor. Yang.
* 2. Balance. Union. Receptive. Yin.
* 3. Communication/interaction. Neutrality.
* 4. Creation.
* 5. Action.
* 6. Reaction/flux. Responsibility.
* 7. Thought/consciousness.
* 8. Power/sacrifice.
* 9. Completion.
* 10. Rebirth.
Digit summing
Numerologists often reduce a number or word by a process known as digit summing, then reach conclusions based on the single digit that is produced.
Digit summing, as the name implies, involves taking the sum of all
of the digits in a number, and repeating the process as necessary until
a single-digit answer is produced. For a word, the values corresponding
to each letter’s place in the alphabet (e.g., A=1, B=2, through Z=26)
are summed.
Examples:

* 3,489 -> 3 + 4 + 8 + 9 = 24 -> 2 + 4 = 6
* Hello -> 8 + 5 + 12 + 12 + 15 = 52 -> 5 + 2 = 7

A quicker way to arrive at a single-digit “summation” is simply to take the value modulo 9, substituting a 0 result with 9 itself.
Different methods of calculation exist, including Chaldean,
Pythagorean, Hebraic, Helyn Hitchcock’s method, Phonetic, Japanese and Indian.
English Letter Numeric Values
A-I J-R S-Z
A = 1 J = 10 S = 19 (10)
B = 2 K = 11 (2) T = 20
C = 3 L = 12 (3) U = 21 (3)
D = 4 M = 13 (4) V = 22 (4)
E = 5 N = 14 (5) W = 23 (5)
F = 6 O = 15 (6) X = 24 (6)
G = 7 P = 16 (7) Y = 25 (7)
H = 8 Q = 17 (8) Z = 26 (8)
I = 9 R = 18 (9)
English Letter Numeric Values - Chaldean Method
A-I J-R S-Z
A = 1 J = 1 S = 3
B = 2 K = 2 T = 4
C = 3 L = 3 U = 6
D = 4 M = 4 V = 6
E = 5 N = 5 W = 6
F = 8 O = 7 X = 5
G = 3 P = 8 Y = 1
H = 5 Q = 1 Z = 7
I = 1 R = 2


Chinese numerology
Some Chinese assign a different set of meanings to the numbers and
certain number combinations are considered luckier then others. In
general, even numbers are considered lucky, since it is believed that
good luck comes in pairs.
Chinese number definitions
Cantonese frequently assign the following definitions, which may differ in other forms of Chinese:

1. - 一 sure
2. - 二 easy
3. - 三 live
4. - 四 - considered unlucky since the pronunciation of 4 ( sì ) sounds like the word for death ( sǐ ).
5. - 五 - the self, me, myself, nothing, never
6. - 六 - easy and smooth
7. - 七 - together
8. - 八 - sudden fortune, prosperity
9. - 九 - long in time
Some lucky number combinations include:
* 168 - road of prosperity or to be prosperous together - many premium-pay telephone numbers in China begin with this number. Many businesses also prefer to have this number as part of their names.
* 518 - I will prosper, other variations include: 5189 (I will
prosper for a long time), 516289 (I will get on a long, smooth
prosperous road) and 5918 (I will soon prosper)
* 888 - prosperity x3.
Other fields
“Numerology” in science
Scientific theories are sometimes labelled ‘numerology’ if their
primary inspiration appears to be mathematical rather than scientific.
This colloquial use of the word ‘numerology’ is quite common within the scientific community and it is mostly used to dismiss a theory as questionable science.[citation needed]
The best known example of ‘numerology’ in science involves the
coincidental resemblance of certain large numbers that intrigued such eminent mathematical physicists as Dirac,
Weyl and Eddington. These numerical co-incidences refer to such
quantities as the ratio of the age of the universe to the atomic unit of time, the number of electrons in the universe, and the difference in strengths between gravity and the electric force for the electron and proton. (’Is the Universe Fine Tuned for Us?’, Stenger V.J., page 3[1]). Large number co-incidences continue to fascinate many mathematical physicists. For instance, James G. Gilson has constructed a ‘Quantum Theory of Gravity’ based loosely on Dirac’s large number hypothesis [2].
Numerology in the Bible
Ivan Panin’s numeric patterns that he claimed to be found from Bible are sometimes called bible numerology.

Sympathy is an emotional affinity in which whatever affects one correspondingly affects the other, and its synonym is pity. Sympathy comes from the Latin sympatha, from Greek: ÏƒÏ Î¼Ïάθεια transliterated as sympatheia, from ÏƒÏ Î½ + Ïάσχω = ÏƒÏ Î¼Ïάσχω literally: to suffer together also: affected by like feelings or emotion. Thus the essence of sympathy is that a person’s feelings reflect or are like those of another or that a person suffers as a response to, or because of, another person’s suffering.

Sympathy exists when the feelings or emotions of one person give rise to similar feelings in another person, creating a state of shared feeling. In common usage, sympathy is usually the sharing of unhappiness or suffering, but it can also refer to sharing other (positive) emotions as well. In a broader sense, it can refer to the sharing of political or ideological sentiments, such as in the phrase “a communist sympathiser”.

The psychological state of sympathy is closely linked with that of empathy, but is not identical to it. Empathy refers to the ability to perceive and directly experientially feel another person’s emotions as they feel them, but makes no statement as to how they are viewed. Sympathy, by contrast, implies a degree of equal feeling, that is, the sympathiser views the matter similarly to how the person themselves does. It thus implies concern, or care or a wish to alleviate negative feelings others are experiencing.

Happiness is an emotional or affective state that is characterized by feelings of enjoyment and satisfaction. As a state and a subject, it has been pursued and commented on extensively throughout world history. This reflects the universal importance that humans place on happiness.

In the Nicomachean Ethics, written in 350 B.C.E., Aristotle stated that happiness is the only thing that humans desire for its own sake. He observed that men sought riches not for the sake of being rich, but to be happy (although the term we translate as ‘happiness’ in Aristotle cannot be adequately defined as either an emotion or a state). Those who sought fame desired it not to be famous, but because they believed fame would bring them happiness. Many ethicists make arguments for how humans should behave, either individually or collectively, based on the resulting happiness of such behavior. Utilitarians, such as John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, advocated the greatest happiness principle as a guide for ethical behavior.

States associated with happiness include well-being, delight, health, safety, contentment, and love. Contrasting states include suffering, depression, grief, anxiety, and pain. Happiness is often associated with the presence of favorable circumstances such as a supportive family life, a loving marriage, and economic stability. Unfavorable circumstances, such as abusive relationships, accidents, loss of employment, and conflicts, diminish the amount of happiness a person experiences. However, according to several ancient and modern thinkers, happiness is influenced by the attitude and perspective taken on such circumstances.
Various forms of happiness

Many English language terms refer to various forms of happiness and pleasure. These terms vary in the intensity of the pleasure they describe, as well as the depth and longevity of the satisfaction. These include: bliss, joy, joyous, carefree, jubilant, exultant, cheerful, playful, amused, fun, glad, gay, gleeful, jolly, jovial, delighted, euphoric, ecstatic, thrilled, elated, enraptured, comfortable, harmonious, and triumphant. Gratification is a deep satisfaction gained from becoming totally absorbed in a complex activity or by working toward meaningful goals.[1]
In other animals aside from humans

For animals, happiness might be best described as the process of reinforcement, as part of the organism’s motivational system. The organism has achieved one or more of its goals (pursuit of food, water, sex, shelter, etc.), and its brain is in the process of teaching itself to repeat the sort of actions that led to success. By reinforcing successful decision paths, it produces an equilibrium state not unlike positive-to-negative magnets. The specific goals are typically things that enable the organism to survive and reproduce.

By this definition, only animals with some capacity to learn should be able to experience happiness. However, at its most basic level the learning might be extremely simple and short term, such as the nearly reflexive feedback loop of scratching an itch (followed by pleasure, followed by scratching more, and so on) which can occur with almost no conscious thought.

In animals

However, to avoid oversimplification, domesticated animals may require needs beyond food, water, sex, and shelter (such as human company, petting, or perhaps needs which mimic that of their owners). Typically, the more domesticated an animal is, the more closely their goals match human behavior.

In humans

When speaking of animals with the ability to reason (generally considered the exclusive domain of humans), goals are no longer limited to short term satisfaction of basic drives. Nevertheless, there remains a strong relationship of happiness to goal fulfillment and the brain’s reinforcement mechanism, even if the goals themselves may be more complex and/or cerebral, longer term, and less selfish than a non-human animal’s goals might be.

Philosophers observe that short-term gratification, while briefly generating happiness, often requires a trade-off with negative repercussions in the long run. Examples of this could be said to include developing technology and equipment that makes life easier but over time ends up harming the environment, causing illness or wasting financial or other resources. Various branches of philosophy, as well as some religious movements, suggest that “true” happiness only exists if it has no long-term detrimental effects. Classical Utilitarianism is a theory of ethics based on quantitative maximization of happiness.

From the observation that fish must become happy by swimming, and birds must become happy by flying, Aristotle points to the unique abilities of man as the route to happiness. Of all the animals only man can sit and contemplate reality. Of all the animals only man can develop social relations to the political level. Thus the contemplative life of a monk or professor, or the political life of a military commander or politician will be the happiest.

In contrast, Zhuangzi points out that only man is endowed with the ability necessary to generate complex language and thought?language and thought that can be used to distinguish between things and form dichotomies. These dichotomies then formed, man tries to find reasons to like one side of things and hate the other. Hence, he loses his ability to love freely, in true happiness, unlike the rest of his animal brethren.

In artificial intelligence

The view that happiness is a reinforcement state can apply to some non-biological systems as well. In artificial intelligence, a program or robot could be said to be “happy” when it is in a state of reinforcing previous actions that led to satisfaction of its programmed goals. For instance, imagine a search engine that has the capacity to gradually improve the quality of its search results by accepting and processing feedback from the user regarding the relevance of those results. If the user responds that a search result is good (i.e. provides positive feedback), this tells the software to reinforce (by adjusting variables or “weights”) the decision path that led to those results. In a sense, this could be said to “reward” the search engine. However, even if the program is made to act like it is happy, there is little doubt that the search engine has no subjective sense of being happy. Current computing technology merely implements abstract mathematical programs which lack the creative power of natural systems. This does not preclude the possibility that future technologies may begin to blur the distinction between such machine happiness and that experienced by an animal or human.

Mystical (religious, spiritual, and mythological) view

Explanation of happiness in mystical traditions, especially in advanced spiritual techniques is related to full balance (conjunction, union, “secret marriage”) of so called inner energy lines (energy channels of a soul or deepest dimension of the human): nadi (ancient Indian), gimel kavim (hebrew), pillars, columns, gnostic ophis or caduceus. In balanced state two main lines (left & right, Ida & Pingala) form third line, called Shushumna or lashon hakodesh (hebr.). Speaking technically (full) activity of this third or central line is happiness. Left and right lines include all aspects of normal human life: sleep and awake, body and mind, physical and spiritual and so on. To attain balanced state of these 2 lines is a main task of life - a paradoxical result of all kinds of activities and endeavours combined with full relax or tranquillity at the same time.

In Christianity, the ultimate end of human existence consists in felicity (Latin equiv. to the Gk. eudaimonia), or “blessed happiness”, described by the 13th-C. philosopher-theologian Thomas Aquinas as a Beatific Vision of God’s essence in the next life. See Summa Theologiae

Personal happiness forms the centerpiece of Buddhist teachings and the Eightfold Path that will lead its practitioner to Nirvana, a state of everlasting happiness.

American Buddhist monk Thanissaro Bhikkhu gave a guided meditation: "Close your eyes and think thoughts of good will. Thoughts of good will go first to yourself, because if you can’t think good will for yourself ? if you can’t feel a sincere desire for your own happiness ? there’s no way you can truly wish for the happiness of others. So just tell yourself, “May I find true happiness.” Remind yourself that true happiness is something that comes from within, so this is not a selfish desire. In fact, if you find and develop the resources for happiness within you, you’re able to radiate it out to other people. It’s a happiness that doesn’t depend on taking anything away from anyone else.”
_____________________________________________________________________

We all want to be happy but the problem has always been that you can’t measure happiness.

Happiness has always been seen as too vague a concept, as Lord Layard, Professor of Economics at the LSE and author of “Happiness - lessons from a new science” points out.

“There is a problem with the word happiness.

“When you use the word happy, it often has the sort of context of balloons floating up into the sky or something frivolous.”

Now scientists say they can actually measure happiness.

Neuroscientists are measuring pleasure. They suggest that happiness is more than a vague concept or mood; it is real.

Measuring happiness

Social scientists measure happiness simply by asking people how happy they are.

It is argued that what a person says about their own happiness tends to tally with what friends or even strangers might say about them if asked the same question.

Most people say they are fairly happy.

Woman answering questions on a PDA
PDAs can be used to measure happiness levels during the day

The leading American psychologist Professor Ed Diener from the University of Illinois, told The Happiness Formula that the science of happiness is based on one straightforward idea:

“It may sound silly but we ask people ‘How happy are you 1-7, 1-10?

“And the interesting thing is that produces real answers that are valid, they’re not perfect but they’re valid and they predict all sorts of real things in their lives.”

One type of measurement even tries to record people’s levels of happiness throughout the day wherever they are.

Ecological momentary assessment uses hand held computers.

The person being quizzed is bleeped and then taken through a questionnaire.

“The measures are not perfect yet I think they are in many ways as good as the measures economists use,” said Professor Diener.

It is a remarkable claim. Simply by asking people, we have a measure of happiness that is as good as the economists’ measure of poverty or growth.

And if true, governments could be judged by how happy they make us.

An adviser to the Prime Minister, David Halpern, told us that within the next 10 years the government would be measured against how happy it made everybody.

Power of happiness

Happiness seems to have almost magical properties.

We have not got proof, but the science suggests it leads to long life, health, resilience and good performance.

Scientists work by comparing people’s reported happiness and a host of other factors such as age, sex, marital status, religion, health, income, unemployment and so on.

In survey after survey involving huge groups of people, significant correlations between happiness and some other factors are repeated.

At the moment scientists cannot prove causation, whether for example people are healthy because they are happy, or whether people are happy because they are healthy.

However, psychologists have been able to identify some very strong links.

According to Professor Diener the evidence suggests that happy people live longer than depressed people.

“In one study, the difference was nine years between the happiest group and the unhappiest group, so that’s a huge effect.

“Cigarette smoking can knock a few years off your life, three years, if you really smoke a lot, six years.

“So nine years for happiness is a huge effect.”

Richer but no happier

Happiness researchers have been monitoring people’s life satisfaction for decades.

Two friends by a fountain
Happy people have close friends

Yet despite all the massive increase in our wealth in the last 50 years our levels of happiness have not increased.

“Standard of living has increased dramatically and happiness has increased not at all, and in some cases has diminished slightly,” said Professor Daniel Kahneman of the University of Princeton.

“There is a lot of evidence that being richer… isn’t making us happier”

The research suggests that richer countries do tend to be happier than poor ones, but once you have a home, food and clothes, then extra money does not seem to make people much happier.

It seems that that level is after average incomes in a country top about £10,000 a year.

Scientists think they know the reason why we do not feel happier despite all the extra money and material things we can buy.

First, it is thought we adapt to pleasure. We go for things which give us short bursts of pleasure whether it is a chocolate bar or buying a new car.

But it quickly wears off.

Second, its thought that we tend to see our life as judged against other people.

We compare our lot against others. Richer people do get happier when they compare themselves against poorer people, but poorer people are less happy if they compare up.

The good news is that we can choose how much and who we compare ourselves with and about what, and researchers suggest we adapt less quickly to more meaningful things such as friendship and life goals.

What makes us happy?

According to psychologist Professor Ed Diener there is no one key to happiness but a set of ingredients that are vital.

Eye looking up
For added happiness, look for meaning in your life

First, family and friends are crucial - the wider and deeper the relationships with those around you the better.

It is even suggested that friendship can ward off germs. Our brains control many of the mechanisms in our bodies which are responsible for disease.

Just as stress can trigger ill health, it is thought that friendship and happiness can have a protective effect.

According to happiness research, friendship has a much bigger effect on average on happiness than a typical person’s income itself.

One economist, Professor Oswald at Warwick University, has a formula to work out how much extra cash we would need to make up for not having friends.

The answer is £50,000.

Marriage also seems to be very important. According to research the effect of marriage adds an average seven years to the life of a man and something like four for a woman.

The second vital ingredient is having meaning in life, a belief in something bigger than yourself - from religion, spirituality or a philosophy of life.

The third element is having goals embedded in your long term values that you’re working for, but also that you find enjoyable.

Psychologists argue that we need to find fulfilment through having goals that are interesting to work on and which use our strengths and abilities.

Unhappiness

However, there are also many things we experience in life that can produce lasting unhappiness.

Professor Ed Diener identifies two key events which can have lasting effects.

After the loss of a spouse it can take several years to regain the previous level of well-being.

The loss of a job can affect a person for years even they are back to work.

So if you are born grumpy are you always going to be grumpy?

The question of whether we can actually use our knowledge of what makes us happy to lift our levels of happiness permanently is hotly debated by psychologists.

According to the positive psychologist Professor Martin Seligman of the University of Pennsylvania it is possible to lift our biological set range of happiness, at least to some extent if we work at it.

“The best you can do with positive emotion is you can get people to live at the top of their set range.

“So I think you’ve got about 10 to 15% leverage but you can’t take a grouch and make him giggle all the time.”