Performance Based Pay for our Cricket Stars?

After seeing the way our overrated cricket team has misfired, stuttered and stumbled against the not-so-mighty West Indies, I believe we must seriously consider a performance based payment system for our spoilt, pampered stars. The system can be something like this:

Batsmen - lets say a score of  45 per innings is par - if a guy scores 45 or above, he gets his pay with incentives if he scores higher; if he scores lower than the required average he gets less with zero pay if he scores less than 80% of the required average. We can factor in other important performance measures such as strike rates etc.

Bowlers - a par should be 2 wickets at an average of less than 30 runs conceded per wicket - based on this par score - a performance based pay system can be designed.

Catches and runouts can attract bonuses to reqrd good fielding.

A bowler like Sreesanth who goes for 82 runs in 13 overs should get zero or probably negative pay for his atrocious, hare brained performance.

Will this make our guys get better? Am not sure — but is there any harm in trying……??