rediff.com
Skip to content


US-Pakistani tussle over Shamsi air base

The control of Shamsi air base in Pakistan’s Baluchistan province has become a bone of contention in US-Pakistan relations. A day after Pakistan’s Defence MInister Chaudhry Ahmad Mukhtar confirmed that the US has been asked to stop using the Shamsi base for drone attacks and to vacate the base — he didn’t say when exactly the demand was made or what the US response has been — an unnamed US official maintains, “That base is neither vacated nor being vacated.” The US official who is ‘familiar with the matter’ told Reuters that the American military personnel haven’t left the base and have no plans to do so.

How the US’ open affront plays out in Pakistani opinion will bear watch. The move to vacate the Americans from Shamsi is a popular decision within Pakistan and the US is taunting the Pakistani opinion. Drone attacks have become an important template of the US’ ‘counterterrorism’ strategy worldwide, which was announced by US president Barack Obama on June 28 — and operating out of Shamsi makes sense. The base is also close to the Iranian border. The Pakistani demand on the US to vacate Shamsi predates the Abbottabad operation and OBL’s killing and it is traceable to the aftermath of the Raymond Davis affair in March when Pakistan got to know about the ramifications of the US intelligence penetration of the insurgent groups and Pakistani agencies. Interestingly, the Blackwater group’s personnel were also located in Shamsi.

How can the US defy Pakistan’s sovereignty over Shamsi? The answer lies in the fact that Pakistan doesn’t itself probably have control of Shamsi. During the Pakistan national assembly debate on May 13 on the Abbottabad operation, which was held in camera, Pak air chief Rao Qamar Suleman apparently disclosed that Shamsi has been under the control of the United Arab Emirates. That is entirely conceivable beause the air strip in Shamsi was originally made exclusively for the use of the Arab sheikhs for falconry trips. It is possible that the US entered into a back to back deal with the UAE government and doesn’t consider answerable to Pakistan.

The US’ access to Shamsi came about in the early years of the Afghan war in 2001 under Pervez Musharraf and it has become a controversy today when the US-Pak ties began deteriorating. The US’ use of Shamsi was kept a ‘top secret’ until February 2009 when London Times printed some Google Earth picture dated 2006 of 3 drone aircraft parked on a parking ramp in the air base. On a broader perspective, Shamsi becomes the symbol of the stupidity and ‘rentier’ mentality of the Pakistani rulers in surrendering their country’s sovereignty to curry favour with the US.

Posted in Diplomacy, Military, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , .


3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Gugga says

    Debashish
    China does not want to monitor Bombay activity from Gwadar, it can so do through Karachi which is closer to Bombay than Gwadar. Gwadar, a chinese built port is a thorn in Pakistan and US relations, India built Bushsher port for Iran, which is a similar deep sea port, not far from Gwadar, but now India cannot do business with iran due to the Nuke deal. hence, Pak-Iran-China would use the transit route. Same would be true once things get stable in Afghanistan, so the Turkmenstan oil can come through Afghanistan into pakistan and camn go to India. Actually taliban signed a deal with USA and Pakistan called TAPI (Turk-Afghan-Pak-india)! So the problem here is for India that it cannot aloow pak to have important role here, due to its strategic location, and USA to allow China access Arabian ocean as then US supremacy in gulf (strait of Hormuz) gets affected. Its a chess game, economic reasons and not religious as precieved.

  2. ms.debasishsarkar@rediffmail.com says

    Shamsi Air bare.
    This air base is getting HOT POTATOS for Paki- Junta. Shamsi’s important is gaining momentum for American. for two reasons. :-
    !. Chinese are developing a NAVAL BASE at GWADAR just stone throw distance from IRNIAN border. Chinese purposes are two folds- First, Iranian Oil access [permanently], then transport the oil either via ARABIAN SEA, or Via Pakistan and through POK Superhighway. So China wants to establish a Permanent Oil Solution. Secondly To make close monitor on Indian’s Economic activities and Oil Explorations on Bombay ports and Bombay High Oil Platforms. And if Hostility breaks down between India and Pakistan. China hoisted a modern missile systems at Gwadar, that within very short times, They can destroy Indian Naval systems in Arabian Sea, and land based Military structures.
    2. Therefore American presence in Shamsi is getting more important [to stay there] for above two reasons. Furthermore Commie Chinese activities in Baluchistan, is getting intolerable for Uncle Sham. For above reason, Americans has a definite Contingency plan, how to Thwart Paki-China’s war game plan. And who knows, Pakistan can break in to pieces, and Baluchistan could be a new independent Country. If that happens, Both USA and India will be beneficiaries. And same time China’s dream will evaporate.

  3. aftab says

    Pakistan gets what it desrves. They have never tasted the pride of being an independent country. They have been obliged by USA on so many occassions that they can not speak to them with authority. They have allowed access to China in some regions of Kashmir. Pakistan could have avoided most of their problems if they had not adopted a hostile attitude towards India.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2014 Rediff.com India Limited. All rights Reserved.  
Terms of Use  |   Disclaimer  |   Feedback  |   Advertise with us