rediff.com
Skip to content


India walks tight rope on Syria

Russia seems to be edging away gradually, imperceptibly from its earlier stance that it won’t be party to a UN Security Council resolution on Syria, similar to that on Libya, which NATO used to mount the military intervention. In an interview Thursday, President Dmitry Medvedev urged Syria’s Bashar Al-Assad to go for reforms lest Russia is compelled to make “some kind of decisions”. He didn’t elaborate but the drift was clear. Meanwhile, Russia’s envoy to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, who is a prescient diplomat and often doubles up as an AWACS aircraft of Russian diplomacy, told today’s Izvestia in an interview that NATO is already in the planning stage for an operation in Syria and that it forms part of an agenda to ultimately attack Iran. He said: “The noose around Iran is tightening. Military planning against Iran is underway. And we [Russia] are certainly concerned about an escalation of a large-scale war in this huge region.”

Rogozin earlier said while on a visit to Ankara recently that the US’s ABM deployments in the Black Sea region is a prelude to attacking Iran. Syria is indeed on the radar. The issue is coming up before the UN SC next week once the secretary-general’s report becomes available. India is finding itself in the thick of the big-power shadow-play since it is occupying the presidency through August. The president has little leeway in swinging the UN SC decisions, which ultimately depend on the P-5, but Ambassador Hardeep Puri still has an important role to play.

In the case of Syria, apart from shepherding the UN SC’s backroom processes onto centre-stage, Puri also needs to weigh in that Syria is India’s old, steady pal. (Syrian DyFM paid a visit to Delhi last week.) But Puri’s main problem will be that US ambassador Susan Rice will be closely watching his performance. Syria falls in the first circle of US’s Middle East project and a regime change in Damascus opens all sorts of possibilities to break Israel’s acute regional isolation. Israel can be trusted to pull all its strings within the top echelons of the Indian foreign policy establishment in the coming days. (It so happens that both NSA and FS are old ‘Israel hands’.) This show is going to be vastly more dramatic than India’s IAEA vote on Iran in 2006 and it is going to be played out in the open.

The Syrian situation is doubtless aggravating. The UN SC statement on Wednesday saw only Lebanon abstaining in the 15-member UN SC. Interestingly, statement said UN SC is “deeply concerned about the deteriorating situation in Syria” and it “deeply regrets” the death of “hundreds of people”. But it also maintained that “the only way to regulate the current crisis is through an organised Syrian initiative and a political process open to all the interested parties.” Now, this may appear to be the Russian position, too, although Medvedev’s remark indicates prevarication. Xinhua has a transparent analysis of what is happening behind the shadow play by the West and Russia.

Posted in Diplomacy.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Dipak Bose says

    India is doing nothing. India does not deserve to be in the UN Security Council.

    Libya is about to be occupied by the Anglo-American-French. India did nothing. Syria is about to be occupied by the agents of Saudi Arabia and Turkey. India did nothing.

  2. Vijay says

    Yeah with a record of supporting/aiding genocide in srilanka – one can expect only this from India.

  3. MURALI SWAMINATHAN says

    India should utilize the opportunity of its (rotating) leadership of the UNSC, effectively – by displaying pragmatism, leadership skills and diplomatic maturity – in bringing up a resolution on the Syrian crisis – in order to advance its cause for a permanent seat in the Security Council – instead of sticking to its Cold-War era mindset.

    In addition to balancing the widely divergent views in the UN Security Council – as a growing power with substantial economic clout – India should be prepared to take a position that respects the values of human rights in countries, at the same time exploring every available option for a peaceful resolution to any crisis, without undue intervention into the internal affairs of any country.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2014 Rediff.com India Limited. All rights Reserved.  
Terms of Use  |   Disclaimer  |   Feedback  |   Advertise with us