India figured as Iran’s number one crude oil customer in January. That may be difficult to believe but it is indeed a statement of fact. Actually, India stepped up its imports of Iranian oil by 37.5 percent, which helped Iran offset a 50 percent cut in Chinese purchases resulting from a dispute in pricing. China now imports around 250000 barrels a day as against India’s 550000 barrels a day, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
Of course, what stands out is that
New Delhi’s Iran policy is crystallising. India will concentrate on its self-interests in a highly fluid regional security scenario without in the least being ideological about the winds of change blowing through that region. This is the message one gets. Indeed, the US-Iran standoff is primarily geopolitical and it doesn’t concern India, which is in any case not in the business of ‘regime change’.
In all probability, Washington too will eventually get to see the futility of this standoff and will move toward engaging Tehran. Despite the western rhetoric, the fact remains that sanctions against Iran failed to work through the past 30 years. Even a noted Iran-baiter like French president Nicolas Sarkozy is warning that a military strike against Iran
serves no purpose.
Now, coming back to India’s oil imports from Iran, Washington will continue to dissuade Delhi from trading with Tehran. The US state department spokesperson told reporters Tuesday that the talks with the visiting Indian foreign secretary in Washington included “how India might find alternative sources… This is a two-track policy, both to encourage countries to wean themselves from Iranian oil, but also to work with suppliers around the world to help countries find alternative sources of supply.”
However, what Washington overlooks is that India’s economic relationship with Iran as such is also at stake here. Without oil imports, India-Iran trade virtually packs up. Delhi’s robust efforts to work out a reliable payment mechanism for the trade with Iran underscores that it intends to not only sustain the present level of trade but do all it can to boost the trade by stepping up India’s exports to Iran. The government is mounting a “huge” business delegation to Iran in end-February
to explore the opportunities for tapping those sectors that are being vacated by the western countries following their embargo against Iran. It is a long-term approach that India is adopting, keeping in view the fact that Iran is a rich country potentially which offers a big market for India’s exports.
The
new payment mechanism — providing for 45% of Iranian oil to be settled for in Indian rupees — opens up interesting possibilities. Of course, Iran has the option to leave the money in the Indian state-owned UCO Bank at an interest rate of 4% or so. But to obviate currency risks, Iran may perhaps prefer to use the money to import from India or to use India as a trading hub to buy from third countries. Iran also can invest the money in Indian bonds or equities, which Delhi might welcome. In sum, the payment mechanism acts as a catalyst to build up the momentum of economic ties as well as broadening and deepening the partnership.
Posted in Diplomacy, Politics.
Tagged with India-Iran, Iran's oil exports, US-Iran standoff.
By M K Bhadrakumar
– February 9, 2012
ElRoz
India doesn’t need an oil pipeline from Iran, tanker loads are cheaper. A gas pipeline from Iran is a different story, that would be a more pronounced geopolitical step in the context of US pressure. Perhaps right now is not the time, but at the moment just the increased oil purchases from Iran are enough of a step by India. I was surprised that China curtailed its purchases from Iran. If anything, I would have expected a vice versa scenario, with India reducing and China maintaining its volumes. India is quite independent in its foreign policy choices, and ought to continue so. As for a comment above that India “is doomed to be a client state”: whose client? Who orders India around today? India plays the diplomatic game, but it is no client of anybody. Yes it lacks certain technologies in the arms industry, but I see Russia, Europe, and USA lining up to sell arms and even technologies to India, a clear contest for the Indian market, and offering quite advanced items. Eventually, India is going to build up a domestic arms industry of its own but industrial cooperation with others will continue - today even USA, EU, and Russia are importing certain military hardware from foreign manufacturers.
I take it that the present venue for delivering all that Iranian oil to India is sea, via giant tankers. What is the state of planning to build oil pipelines via Pakistan?
I had commented several hours ago on this piece.
Why is my commnent not published?
How does your moderation work?
India seems doomed to be a client state because it lacks expertise and knowhow in most areas. Neither does it have an international presence and diplomatic skills. Itt just drifts along in a hesitant and indecisive fashion.
To acquire knowhow, iIt is forced to latch on powerful aggressors like the US (nuclear field) and Israel (weapons and technology), sacrificing moral principles. It betrayed an old friend Iran at US behest at the UN on two occasions and it is not clear whether it has crafted a coherent policy on MidEast issues. It just makes ad hoc decisions, making sure not to offend the big players.
Can it become a global power by hanging on to their coat tails?
Whither the “Natural Alliance with US (and Israel)”?….Next Steps , NSG and all the other goodies?