Skip to content

US fine tunes Iran talks – with eye on Israel

Washington spelt out for the first time its approach to negotiations with Iran. This came in the form of a structured interview by Special Assistant to United States President Barack Obama and the White House coordinator for arms control Gary Samore, who took part in the talks at Istanbul between the P5+1 and Iran last Saturday. 

Samore evidently knew Tehran would be listening. And he expressed satisfaction that Iran is serious about negotiations and disclosed that Iran proposed that in the present interim since Istanbul, an agenda could be prepared for the upcoming round in Baghdad on May 23. He noted, “we have started a process” although a “comprehensive solution” will take time. Samore reiterated a “step-by-step” approach. 
He underscored two key points. First, US would front load the talks with those elements of Iran’s nuclear programme that are of “most concern from the standpoint of developing a nuclear weapons capacity”. He specified: a) Iran should give up 20-percent enrichment; b) Iran should suspend work on Arak heavy water research reactor facility. 
Second, he qualified that while Iran would have the right to pursue a nuclear programme under the NPT, exactly what elements of the programme it could pursue will be a matter of negotiations.
Of course, Samore didn’t disclose what would be the US’ “reciprocal steps”. The US would probably say it wouldn’t go ahead with more sanctions? Samore couldn’t help grandstanding that “time works on our [Obama's] side.” 
Samore slightly shifted the goal post, which would have been the purpose of his interview. Trust Tehran to respond. This could be negotiating tactic after assessing the Iranian “mindset” at the Istanbul round. Obama’s need is to keep things from blowing up till he gets re-elected for a second term. (That, paradoxically, is what worries Israel.) He is politically vulnerable till November — be it on Iran nuclear issue or the Palestine problem. (But that, precisely, is what Israel is banking on.) Read the transcript of Samore’s interveiew here.

Posted in Diplomacy.

Tagged with , , .

One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Johan says

    The only rationale for Iranians to “negotiate” with the “P5 1” zionist couriers at all, would be to gain time, not sell parcels of the hard won independence. One would sincerely hope that they will fruitfully use that time towards acquisition of the only effective protection tool there is on this planet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2015 India Limited. All rights Reserved.  
Terms of Use  |   Disclaimer  |   Feedback  |   Advertise with us