RECOGNIZE TAMIL EELAM
Posted in Politics on 10/29/2008 03:52 am by Nandhi VarmanN.Nandhivarman, General Secretary Dravida Peravai in an exclusive interview to Tamil Sydney.com says:
Q: In the aftermath of all parties of Tamilnadu protesting against Indian inaction over the genocide of Tamils in Srilanka, the Government of
Every step is welcome, but let those take the steps look back to past, so that they may not falter in their steps. Close on the heels of Government of India coming out hesitantly, there are moves by forces opposed to Tamils rights to confuse and fish into troubled waters. The Hindu gave undue importance to the 150 day Chief Minister of Eastern Province Mr. Sivanesathurai Santhirakanthan, by publishing his views. The
Q: Are you of the opinion that provincial councils within unitary Srilanka would not resolve the crisis, if so please elaborate the reasons?
A: Even before Srilanka became independent in 1928, Donoughmore Commission suggested the creation of Provincial councils. It took 12 years and in 1940 the Executive Committee of Local Administration chaired by Thiru. S.W.R.D.Bandaranaike considered these proposals which were approved by legislature. Again in 1947, on the floor of the House of Representatives, Thiru.Bandaranaike reiterated his support. In 1955 Choksy Commission recommended the establishment of Provincial Councils. The Government headed by Thiru.S.W.R.D.Bandaranaike in May 1957 presented a draft bill for the establishment of Provincial Councils. Having been repeatedly advocated by Sinhalese Government of the day, the stamp of approval by the Tamil parties, then who were only seeking federalism, came when in July 1957 Thiru.S.V.J.Selvanayagam 'Bandaranaike pact was signed. The pact paved way for direct election to regional councils with allocation of agriculture, cooperatives, land development, colonization and education as regional subjects, but even that dream was scuttled by the opposition parties mainly the UNP headed by J.R.Jayawardane.
Then in July 1960 Federal Party of Selvanayagam supported the SLFP headed by Mrs.Srimavo Bandaranaike, hoping it will implement the earlier pact. Though in July 1963, Mrs. Bandaranaike paid lip service by appointing a committee on District Councils and that eyewash committee too submitted its Draft of the Proposed Bill to create District Council. That ended there and nothing further was done.
Then in 1965 Dudley Senanaike-Selvanayagam pact was signed in order to get the Federal party's support to UNP Government. This pact affirmed assurances for early devolution of powers with creation of District Councils. In 1968 Dudley Senanaike cabinet approved a draft bill for the establishment of District Councils. Opposition mounted pressure and in July 1958 District Councils bill was withdrawn. Federal Party retaliated by withdrawing support to Government.
A Constituent Assembly was constituted after SLFP led by Mrs. Srimavo Bandaranaike won with huge majority in General Elections. The Federal Party submitted its proposals to the Constituent Assembly. The memorandum called for "a federal form of government with three autonomous Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim states." The demand of Federal Party for parity of status between Tamil and Sinhala was defeated in the Constituent Assembly. Federal Party boycotted but the new Constitution that changed Ceylon to Sinhalese name Srilanka making it a theocratic state with Buddhism as state religion was passed on 22nd May 1972. In 1979 August President J.R.Jayawardane appointed a Presidential Commission on creation of District Development Councils.
Well, to sum up, these were the demands of Tamil parties, more particularly The Federal Party headed by the Gandhi of Eelam Thiru Selvanayagam, as he was fondly referred in those days. The National Security Adviser of India, and those who currently have run out of ideas or initiatives, must realize they are clinging to certain phrases like "devolution of powers within unitary Srilanka" which are unrealizable goals, the unfolding drama since 1928 till date prove beyond an iota of doubt.
The role model of Indian states, which these people hold as panacea in their minds, will never be acceptable to Sinhalese .Even in
Q: These failures were between Srilankan ruling parties and Tamil parties. There were no mediators between them.
A: Have you forgotten that in the aftermath of 1983 genocide of Tamils, and then Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi sent her emissary Thiru.G.Parthasarathy. These proposals were later known as Annexure C proposals. Is Indian bureaucracy now in external affairs ministry ignorant of the fate of Annexure C proposals? Have they erased from their memories the reasons for the failures of Thimpu talks? Later too what happened to the visit of Indian Ministers Mr.Natwar Singh and Mr.P.Chidambaram? Where their December 19 proposals, as they were called in 1986, had gone? Then the infamous pact and fiasco of IPKF need not be reminded. Those who currently advise Government of India and the Peace Emissary of Madam Sonia Gandhi, Mr.Pranab Mukerjee, must know they are dealing with the fate of Tamils who had met broken promises too long and who are facing genocide since 1983 to 2008. Just by simply repeating within unitary Srilanka or devolution of powers the conflict could not be resolved. They must search their brains for solutions. They must place their valuable suggestions for public debate. Before Mr.Sivashankar Menon assumed office as Foreign Secretary, and before he was relieved as Indian Ambassador of
Q: Then what is the other way out? What option will satisfy Eelam Tamils? Who should mediate?
A: The Tamilnadu Chief Minister Dr.Kalaignar M.Karunanithi is of the view that
In addition to Monaco, the smaller European territories of this type are: the Principality of Liechtenstein (pop. 31,000), the semi-independent state lets of Andorra (pop. 64,000) and San Marino (pop. 24,000) and four British territories — the Isle of Man (pop. 70,000), the Channel Islands (pop. 150,000), the Faeroe Islands (pop. 45,000), and Gibraltar (pop. 29,000) ' as well as Vatican City State. With just 700 residents and 109 acres, the
The
The Netherlands Antilles (pop. 208,000) is home of George Soros’ famous Quantum hedge fund, while
The Pacific Ocean region has two dozen island states, ranging in size from
Some of the territories embrace hundreds of islands scattered over more than a thousand miles of ocean. The Indian Ocean is site of four large island groups, including the
Africa, too, has a number of SSTs ' 12 states according to the World Bank count, including the islands of Cape Verde (pop. 416,000) and Sao Tome and Principe (pop.142, 000), coastal Djibouti (pop. 636,000) and continental Swaziland (pop. 969,000), as well as a number of territorial remnants of colonialism, like Ceuta (pop. 69,000) and Melilla (pop. 60,000), Spanish territories on Morocco’s Mediterranean coast.
Thirty-two of the Commonwealth’s 53 member countries are small states - mostly with populations of less than 1.5 million They range in size from micro-states such as St Kitts and Nevis, Nauru, Niue, and Tuvalu with less than 50,000 people each, to countries like Botswana, The Gambia and Mauritius
The world’s political map, dominated by large states, includes many lesser-known small states and territories. Using the World Bank benchmark of 1.5 million populations, there are 56 small states, as well as more than a hundred small territories under the sovereign control of others. A substantial majority of these small political units are islands or island federations, like
If this is the world scenario, Eelam can be independent, can sustain as independent nation, and its demand for independence does not lack logic. Hence Dravida Peravai appeals to all the member states of the United Nations to arrive at a consensus to extend support to the independent nation of Tamil Eelam. India must work towards this goal and Dr.Kalaignar M.Karunanithi, Chief Minister of Tamilnadu must work hard keeping the unity of Tamil parties to arrive at a consensus towards once for all resolving the Eelam Tamils issue, which cannot remain forever like this in turmoil.
Q: The attitude of Sinhalese towards Tamils is nothing new, they have this Raj Thackerey mentality against all, you had spoken in past. Could you elaborate?
A: The first riots in Srilanka are more than a century old. In 1883 they attacked the Christians. In 1902 the Sinhalese sponsored riots targeted Dalits. During 1915, the Sinhalese showed their ire against North Indian traders and South Indian Muslim petty businessmen. Mr.Shivashankar Menon must go back to the pages of history when in 1930; Sinhalese riots targeted Malayalis from
[Interviewed by freelance journalist R. Ramachandran, formerly of New Indian Express ]
“The future of Tamil race has become a question mark. I am unable to sleep, whenever I think of it. Let us save the Tamil race and its honour. Let us avoid the racial genocide in Sri Lanka at whatever price.” - TN CM M Karunanidhi!
அடுத்த காட்சி. காடு, கழனி, சாலையோரங்களில் அகதி மக்கள் தொண்டுநிறுவனங்கள் தந்த தென்னை ஓலைக்கீற்றுகளால் குருவிக்கூடுகளைப் போல சிறுசிறு வீடுகளைக் கட்டும் முனைப்பில் இருக்கிறார்கள். அதற்கும் கூட வழியில்லாதவர்கள் துணிகளால் கூடாரம் அமைக்கிறார்கள். இடிந்து சிதறிக் கிடக்கும் வீடுகளிலிருந்து அட்டை, தகடுகளை எடுத்து வந்தும் `கூடு’ கட்டுகிறார்கள். நேற்று வரை மாளிகை, மாடி வீடுகளில் தூங்கிய குழந்தைகள் இன்று மரங்களில் கட்டிய தூளிகளில் உறங்குகிறார்கள்.
இலங்கை ராணுவம், புலிகளின் அரசியல் தலைநகரான கிளிநொச்சி-யைப் பிடிக்க இப்போது இடையூறாக நின்று கொண்டிருப்பவர் தளபதி பானு. ஈழப்போர் முனையில் இருந்த அவரை மிகுந்த சிரமத்திற்குப் பின் நாம் பேட்டி கண்டோம். தமிழக இதழ் ஒன்றுக்கு அவர் அளிக்கும் முதல் பேட்டி இதுவே.
“அப்படிப் போகத் துணியாமல்தான் அவர்கள் இங்கே அகதிகளாக இருக்கிறார்கள். ஏற்கெனவே மட்டக்களப்பு, அம்பாறை, திரிகோணமலை பகுதிகளில் ராணுவத்தை நம்பிச் சென்றவர்களுக்கு என்ன நடந்தது என்பதை அறியாதவர்களா நம் மக்கள்? அங்கே ராணுவச் சித்திரவதை தொடர்கிறது. ஒட்டுப்படைகள் (ராணுவத்துக்கு ஆதரவாக இயங்கும் தமிழ்க்குழுக்கள்) கையில் துவக்குகளோடு ஆள் கடத்தல், அழித்தொழிப்பு வேலைகளை ராணுவத்துடன் சேர்ந்து செய்கிறார்கள்.