Our Dear Sitaram Yechury 'dutifully'
writes a column in the 'Congress Sponsored' rag, which 'allegedly' they call as
a newspaper. "The Hindustan Times"!? Which is in fact nothing more than 'The
Congress Times' or worst 'The Bash BJP Times'.

Very aptly the 'Tele Communist' calls
his column 'Left Hand Drive' as of course, 'Left Just Can't be Right'. I read
his columns for the great comic relief and this time too he does not
disappoint.

This week the focus of his ire is Taslima and all
those who are advocating for her. I can quite understand his 'frustration' as
his party CPI (Marauders) has been under some
'severe' scrutiny from all sides for their 'confirmed' role in the mayhem in
Nandigram.

Normally, I would have just read it- in loo;
smiled, and used the paper for what it is worth but for the interesting twists
and 'indignation' in this piece, I thought, why I should not read/share it with
you! As the way I read 'reading between the lines'! So here I am reading with
you all, with my usual communal rumblings thrown in.

He calls it "Our Con Artists",
taking a cue; let me
call it as

"Our Con
Communists".

For you to easily identify my rumblings I am using
the 'communal' ink color, rest the
Sita Ji is in black.

So the fun begins

The hue and cry being raised by the BJP and other
RSS tentacles (tentacles! Ok! Mean all
those who vote for the BJP! Democratic rule no 1.either you are with us or
against us! Typical Communist Style) over the issue of the stay
of Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen in India is, indeed, the height of
duplicity. Even Narendra Modi, (Chalo,
second line and second word, and it is MODI!) who conducted the
symphony of bloodshed in Gujarat in 2002, (Secularist will just not let wounds
heal) has jumped on to this bandwagon by offering asylum and
protection to Taslima in his state. This effort to project themselves as the
champions of 'freedom of ex-pression' does not even serve as a mask to conceal
their true intention of seeking to sharpen communal polarisation through such a
stand. (OH! Really! Sure you
Sir?) Given the fact that some sections of Muslims (See the use of word 'Muslims' could not a section of
society would have been better, Mr.Secularist? Communists, after all do not
believe in any religion!) have taken offence to Taslima's
writings on Islam and the Prophet Mohammad, the BJP has sprung to her defence.
Thus, they are seeking to reinforce their anti-Muslim stance and consequently
consolidate the Hindu vote-bank. Nothing else can explain this sudden
fondness for Taslima. (Extending the
same logic Mr.Tele Communist admits that by making a 'Pro Muslim 'stand, they
are consolidating their 'Muslim Vote Bank' the very same point I emphasized upon
in my last post. This say all about the 'secularism they practice, and yes
nothing else explain the packing her (Taslima) off in the middle of night by his
Party to the same 'anti Muslim' party ruled Rajasthan!
HUH!)

The duplicity lies in the fact that the BJP and the
saffron brigade continues with its relentless campaign to send 'Bangladeshis'
back from the metros of Delhi and Mumbai.
(And your party and Congress's relentless efforts to 'import' as many
Bangladeshi Muslims, cynically for votes alone with ration cards ready at
borders! Come on Mr.Yechury you neither need being a JNUite nor Duffer to
understand all this . Anyway it is not a rocket science to comprehend all this.
BTW, Dear Sir, your party had opposed Mr. APJ. for reelection as the President,
THE man who really deserved . you remember? And this humble 'blogger' supported
him for reelection and no thanks you bestowed us with 'some one' nation
questioned.) In the process, many a genuine Indian
citizen, who happens to be a Muslim ('genuine' Indians and only 'Muslims!' still secular are
they!?) hailing from West Bengal, have been harassed and
hounded. Further, further duplicity lies in their rabid intolerance of any
artistic ex-pression that they consider offensive to their (Mind the word 'their' oh Ho! Their=Hindus and ours
=Muslims) religious sentiments. Over the last decade, there have
been innumerable instances of brazen attacks on artists of a wide spectrum, the
most infamous (really, give an example
please Dear Comrade) of them being attacks against Indian
painter, M.F. Husain. His house was vandalised, (concede d, the point, yes-vandalized right, I condemn
that, but did they riot? Did they riot on streets like your friendly 'friends'
did last week in Kolkatta or in Hyderabad? Show me one to believe SIR, I have
already put one Video showing you the mirror) his paintings that
sell in international auctions at phenomenal prices (as a friend of mine often express, OYE HOI! Acha JI! See
this " international auctions at phenomenal
prices") were destroyed, and
court proceedings were initiated against him at various places. (Yes Dear Court proceedings not riots on
streets) The net result is that one of India's illustrious sons
is forced to live abroad virtually in exile. (Virtually! Why? He is a fugitive, if not
then why does Mr. Sitaram
Ji not invite him over and ask to face the courts!) The BJP
spokesman in the Lok Sabha says, "Husain is welcome to come back and
face charges We don't stop him from coming and facing the law."
(So! It is your Government-albeit supported
from outside but l leave that for the good 'Doctor' to say, or bring him back,
better still gets him deported or arrested, as he is an absconder from law. Why
not? Who stops you? If u can stall a deal which is in India's interest and
certainly not in China's so such a vehement opposition, call and get him tried
in court and get him freed! Why Not? After all, law applies to all equally. Mr.
Malhotra might have said after reading me J check the time and date
line)

and ask him to face what Everyone
needs to both face and abide by the law. This is not the contentious issue. The
same law of the land must also protect the life and properties of the
concerned individual.(Since when Communists
become interested in properties and concerned individuals in the Nandigarm
case the infamous 'salim' group!) When these are
violated with impunity by the saffron brigade, where is the protection?
(But RED brigade GETS IMMUNITY! Right or
Left? I reaffirm, ' no two wrongs make a right'.
Right!)

The concert of noted Pakistani ghazal singer Ghulam
Ali was disrupted in Mumbai. (Well could
you please tell me why and why Lata was denied to perform in Pakiastan, till
date?) artist'allowed in The shooting of Deepa Mehta's film,
Water, was sought to be prevented. Films like Parzania (all ready bared the truth in my earlier post called
"Modi, Mody and Parzainia") on the 2002 Gujarat carnage
(Godhara?) or Fanaa are
attacked. In fact, some filmmakers needed to take 'permission' for their films
to be screened. (And none of them
approached the competent courts had the case been so! Who is bigger, some
Comrade or Courts? Who to believe?) In May 2007, the saffron
brigade ransacked the prestigious M.S. University in Vadodara protesting against
an in-house (emphatically repudiated, since
any thing which is for public can not be in house) painting of a
student for hurting their (NO, shall I send
u the pic again Mr. Comrade? I do not want to publish that again, as I am more
responsible than Communists, but should you want I could. Dare
me!) religious sentiments ? the same charge that some Muslim
organisations have raised against Taslima.(So you sent her packing to a Communal
State,Rajasthan,that too in the middle of night, with out informing the State
govt. either! Strange! Speaks volumes of your courage) On May
19, 2007, justifying this attack, the BJP said: "Freedom of ex-pression does not
mean hurting religious sentiments." Clearly, the saffron brigade does not accept
the saying, 'What is sauce for the goose is also sauce for the
gander'. (Exactly! Did you not
vehemently oppose then? And if BJP is opposing now, how does the sauce for
the gander is also not sauce for the goose
J?)

This list of moral policing being done by the
saffron brigade can continue endlessly. (Agree, but riots?) However, on the
question of Taslima's stay in India, the record must be set right. (Sure! Yes.)
The question of any foreign national
(Sonia to start with!)
visiting or staying in India is based on the granting of a visa,
which is the sole prerogative of the central government. Once this is done, the
centre can well prescribe certain conditions as well as locations in India where
the person concerned can stay. Wherever the person stays, it is incumbent upon
the concerned state government to provide security, (So u packed her off surreptitiously in the middle of
night that too to a communal state. Mr. Marxist?) given the fact
that law and order is a state subject under our Constitution. (So we witnessed when the CRPF was kept waiting, till
some faithful CPI
(Murderers) recaptured the 'lost'
territory!)

The UPA government's statement in Parliament on
Wednesday has clearly indicated that Taslima would be permitted to stay in India
subject, of course, to the usual conditions that she would "eschew political
activities in India or any actions which may harm India's relations with
friendly countries." (It should be applied
to those as well who believe in Fatherland-not so friendly neighbor, after
all) It is also expected that
the guest "will refrain from activities and ex-pressions that may hurt the
sentiments of our people. ("Our
people "! Muslims
alone read it so) For nearly three years, Taslima has been
living in Kolkata and the West Bengal government has been providing her the
required protection. (That exactly is my
point. Why till NOW! HOW THE THINGS CHANGED POST NANDIGRAM!?)It
is, therefore, not merely unjust and unfair to target the West Bengal government
on this score but also an outright political attack to score points.
(Stop Pleading,
Mr.Sita)

Returning to Modi's defence of Taslima, a report
that appeared in the November 28 edition of this paper is both shocking and
revealing. (Chalo aab Modi puran
shru!)

This list of moral policing being done by
the saffron brigade can continue endlessly. However, on the question of
Taslima's stay in India, the record must be set right. The question of any
foreign national visiting or staying in India (CPI (Marauders) willing, West Bengal
too) is based on the granting of a visa, (Read cadre's willingness) which is the
sole prerogative of the central government. (Indeed ask Singoor or/and Nandigaram residents)
Once this is done, (cleaning off all 'political dissent')
the center (controlled by
US, aree US baba mean us CPI (M) not U.S.A . Idiots as u r) can
well prescribe certain conditions as well as locations in India where the person
concerned can stay.(Like ,Oh!, who are you
to ask as the comrade say they will decide where and how and under what
conditions . Right Sir? Lal Sallam) Wherever the person stays,
it is incumbent upon the concerned state government to provide
security, (like it has been provided in
Nandigram u idiots believe him NOW) given the fact that law
and order is a state subject under our Constitution. (Bhai do understand now, under THEIR constitution,
Na!)

The UPA (Unholy Perverse Association of mutually
fighting parties- post election) government's statement in Parliament on Wednesday
has clearly indicated that Taslima would be permitted to stay in India subject,
of course, to the usual conditions that she would "eschew political activities
in India or any actions which may harm India's relations with friendly
countries." It is also expected that the guest (though West Bengal Govt. differs on that, 'her' being
the 'guest' I mean) "will refrain from activities and
ex-pressions that may hurt the sentiments of our (read, Green Brigade) people." For nearly
three years, Taslima has been living in Kolkata and the West Bengal government
has been providing her the required protection. It is, therefore, not merely
unjust and unfair to target the West Bengal government on this score but also an
outright political attack to score points. (What is now left to score! Who will strip a man who is
naked or what is left to strip that is naked,
already!)

Returning to Modi's defence of Taslima, a
report that appeared in the November 28 edition of this (of course, where else than this paper! "The Congress
Times"). paper is both shocking and revealing. Two
survivors of the 2002 carnage (post
Godhara, not a word for 56 Hindu men, women and children, who did not survive.
sic!) have reportedly stated that they will vote for
Modi "because I don't know what Bajrang Dal will do to us if he is voted out".
(Now! What do you call this? If a Muslim
(even if he wants to, genuinely) should not vote Modi in, lest he is branded as
a 'coward' who is overawed by Modi!) This is Abdul Majid, who
lost seven family members, including a daughter who was raped and killed and two
sons who were burnt alive. The other survivor who echoes this sentiment is
Khaliq Noor Mohammad Sheikh. Apart from losing his father and four uncles during
Partition, he lost his wife and all five children in 2002. He tells the
reporter, "You must have heard of Kausar Bi, the pregnant girl whose baby was
ripped out of her. I am her father." (My
heart felt sympathizes with all those who lost their near and dear ones;
including Sabarmati Express victims at least I do not distinguish them as
Hindus or Muslims. Period.)

This unfortunately confirms that
Machiavelli and his discourses with the Prince suggesting diabolic ways to
retain power continue to remain valid even today. One of his dictums was: First
demonstrate to the people the worst that you are capable of (Like CPI (M) goons did in Nandigram).
Then proceed not to repeat it (Send the CPI
(M) cadres in, for recapturing the territory, in uniform, halting the CRPF in
their tracks). The people will then heave a sigh of relief
(after paying a compensation of Rs. 5000/=
to 15000/= as in Nandigram to harvest their own paddy) and come
to look upon you (CPI (M) as a
benefactor (and yes only after u fly the
Hammer and Sickle (well! Symbolic! Isn't it?) RED FLAG over your burnt and
looted Hut/hutments over what ever is left). Machiavelli
probably did not know then that he would find in, (in CPI (M)) centuries later, an ardent and
sincere disciple (more
than) in Modi.

Those who in their overpowering desire to
belittle (OH! Really! Why should I kill u
when u are hell bent to commit suicide!), if not eliminate
(well! Have you not been
already?), the present influence of the Left in the country,
(Pardon me saying SIR, a lame duck PM is
not the country. Period. A country ruled by the UPA may be at your mercy but not
this NATION, MIND YOU.) compare Nandigram with Gujarat are not
only belittling the tragedy of the 2002 carnage but are, in fact, extending
support to Modi and giving a degree of legitimacy to the communal carnage. The
debate on Nandigram has taken place in Parliament (though you tried every trick in your book not to,
despite that) and will continue for sometime to remain in public
discourse. (Well, not because of you but
despite of you) We have joined issue (did you really have an option but not
to!) and there shall be opportunities to do so in the future as
well (sure I look forward to. Why not start
answering me first SIR!) Suffice to state here that one cannot
afford to allow anti-communist prejudices to lead into positions of support to
communal fascism. (But to Communist
Stalinism. ergo!)

Those succumbing to such a proclivity must
recollect what the German intellectual Pastor Neimoeller had said at the time of
Nazi ascendancy:
"First they came for the Jews/Hindus
and I did not
speak out ? because I was not a Jew. /Hindu
Then they came for the
communists/Communalists
and I did not speak out ? because
I was not a communist. /Communalist
Next they came for the trade
unionists/Sanghis
and I did not speak out because I
was not a trade unionist. /Sanghi
Then they came for
me/Hindus
and there was no one left to
speak out for me."/Hindus

Sitaram Yechury,
MP, Rajya Sabha & Member, CPI(M) Politburo

Prudent
Indian, PI, India and Citizen of India, Jai Hind. Vande
Matram.