Archive

Archive for the ‘society’ Category

Flash Mob of Thugs in Pune

May 16th, 2012
Comments Off

A colleague shares an incident which happened recently. While going home from office late at night around 9, he had to pass through a somewhat isolated patch of road, though there were some vehicles passing through. Suddenly a car which was passing by stopped and 3 people came out of it. They stopped him and started shouting at him accusing him of hitting their car and damaging it. In a few moments, a mob of around 20-30 people gathered at the site immediately and everyone started abusing him and asking for money as compensation for the claimed damages done.  


The friend notes that the mob had gathered in no time as if it was a planned scheme. Also, the car was new and didn’t have a number plate. There was no single scratch either on the car or on his bike as there was no real hitting which had happened. The friend hailed from North India and this incident happened in Pune in Maharashtra, so there were language issues too. Ultimately he was able to convince them that nothing had happened and anyhow succeeded in rushing away without paying any money to them. This, he believes might not happen with everyone and hence he warns bike riders especially from IT companies, to be aware and vigilant about such flash mobs looting people…  


Posted [here]

‘Goonj’ from the eyes of Darren Gest

July 4th, 2011
Comments Off

A very interesting article from Darren, who spent some time with the NGO ‘Goonj’ while in India. It is a kind of review of Goonj, as well as a feedback for we Indians :)  


I am sure you will find it very interesting. 


Someway, Somehow: The valuable lesson I learned in India 


http://www.vanderbilt.edu/magazines/vanderbilt-business/2010/11/someway-somehow/ 


Darren Gest, who earned his MBA degree from Vanderbilt in 2010, is currently a Human Capital Senior Consultant at Deloitte Consulting in Chicago.


 

New Beginning for me in Volunteering

May 31st, 2011
Comments Off

http://datastore.rediff.com/h5000-w5000/thumb/6858606E665A6A667263/yo9aio5fg482vthc.D.0.Volunteering_rahul_writes.jpg

Donating old clothes and some usable items like toys and utensils is a very good idea. Often we have the will but don’t find the opportunity. There are many NGOs who specialize in facilitating in that. I knew of a very good NGO which ran a campaign to collect old clothes in cities and then reach it to remote and needy people for ‘cloth for work’ scheme. It has also won many awards, including a Best NGO and a World Bank award. They have a collection center or warehouse in my city, but that is far from our office. So here is what I thought and made a scheme: 
 


I talked to them and offered myself as a volunteer. I planned to collect old clothes and items from my colleagues and friends, and would deposit those to their collection center in the weekends. They have agreed to my offer and gave the necessary details.  


So I have informed my colleagues and friends that anytime if they want to donate old clothes and some usable items for the poor, they could feel free to contact me. I shall make sure the items reach the NGO. I am not posting the specific details like name of the NGO and address; would like to pass these to those who are interested.  


This is my first proper social initiative. So far I have tried to be part of some one-off social campaigns and also contributed monetarily, but this time I wish to contribute my efforts, selflessly, with a plan…  


Regards,


Rahul

Is new prosperity creating raw deals for some working women?

March 16th, 2011
Comments Off


Rukmini was a girl who grew up under fond encouragement of her parents. She grew up with a dream in her eyes – to be financially independent and to work and make use of her eduction. She saw her dream come true when she got a partner after marriage who allowed her to pursue her career. She cherished her first salary which she donated in total to an old-age home. Within a few years, her businessman husband got it all coming in his ways and achieved a grand success. His business thrived on a web based business model and the influx of high earning young population. And then, he asked his wife to quit her job and “look after the children”. 


Rukmini had to quit her job. She had a Hobson’s choice between her family and her job. 


This story is a quite real; it is happening behind the walls of 3/4BHK flats in high-rise Indian Metros. And the factor responsible for this trend is: high economic growth and the tremendous opportunities created by it.  


I wonder if India’s high GDP growth and the new economic successes are creating raw deals for some women. Just a decade earlier, it was thought that both husband-wife working was a necessity to survive. With salaries for highly educated professionals and profits of successful new-age entrepreneurs going beyond the roof, this is not true anymore. And when it comes to re-prioritizing, it is mostly women who are asked to stay back at home and raise the children.  


Indeed, this trend is one flip side to India’s growth story… 

- Rahul

Shoe Shine Boy

December 8th, 2010
Comments Off

We were shopping in the Karol Baug market in Delhi, and stopped to have momos which are my wife’s favorite. Suddenly a boy came up to me and asked me to get my shoe polished. “Kara lo na saab”, (Please get it polished, Sir) he kept on insisting for a shoe-polish. “Only Rs 5”, he won’t leave me. We didn’t have time and the place was too crowded, so I couldn’t help. I took out some coins from my pocket and gave those to him, saying, “Rakh lo” (Keep it). He started to have my shoe, but I interrupted saying I didn’t want to get my shoes polished but he could keep the money. He thanked me gratefully and left.  


After some time, I heard a familiar voice. It was him, the shoeshine boy. “Madam, get your shoes polished”, he was trying to convince another customer. “Achcha, fir 2 rupaye de dijiye na” (Ok, then please help me with 2 rupees…) I was struck!  


Just because I gave him some rupees without any work, he found the trick to earn money in begging! I am sure my gesture made him see it that way, because he had not ‘readily’ accepted my coins.  


I guess that is what a lot of charity works do – they make beggars out of the poor.  


- Rahul

Donating Old Clothes through Goonj

November 19th, 2010
Comments Off

http://datastore.rediff.com/h5000-w5000/thumb/6858606E665A6A667263/dwepzawrwyulm0m1.D.0.Goonj_Logo.jpg

Donating old clothes to the ones who need it but can’t afford, is a noble idea. Many times we donate old clothes to the nearby maids / servants / security guards. But at times, they are not so poor to accept those. Hence, we wonder what to do with the old clothes which get discarded every year. There are some NGOs who can help us in this regard. 
 


Goonj is one such NGO. It runs a campaign called “Vastra Samman” - which helps the poor with old clothes donated by us. I have donated old clothes through them when I was in Mumbai. So I thought to share this with you too.  


You can search the website http://www.goonj.org/collection.html to find out Collection Centers in your city. Or just visit the homepage http://www.goonj.org and click on “GOONJ Offices & Dropping Centres” on the left hand side menu.  


There are some guidelines for donations, e.g. all donated clothes should have been pre-washed. Please go through the clothes donation Guide Lines and other details about the NGO at: http://www.goonj.org/collection.html  


I hope you would make use of this facility.  


- Rahul

Difficult to be Good?

November 1st, 2010
Comments Off

Someone asked if it is difficult to be good? Does it pay more to be dishonest?  


I think the answer is yes, though it is not so simple to say yes. If one is righteous and of a good character, life is difficult for one because life favors those who are ‘flexible’. Keep lots of rules to follow and values telling you not to do this and that, and you face many road-blocks and hiccups.  


From famous examples, we can recall one with Gandhi ji. He was pained when he spoke the truth but his teacher didn’t listen to him and gave him punishment. Gandhi ji said that the truthful and righteous need to be more vigilant than others, in order to survive. And that’s the key. We can choose to be good and honest, but then we would have to ensure that we maintain higher level of vigilance too.  


I believe that in the end, it is your clear conscience that matters most. If you have done nothing wrong, not harmed others, didn’t have evil designs to progress, then you would be a happy man/woman from your heart. It is said that clear conscience is the best pillow. Also, I believe that those who are righteous face greater problems in life and hence they also become stronger and more virtuous. I believe many people would still favor these guys over those without a backbone, i.e. without a clear conscience.  


- Rahul


 

Hit Counter
Hit Counter

Poor and Dishonest?

October 30th, 2010
Comments Off

I went to her to get my slippers mend. She was a cobbler sitting on the road side of a location on the outskirts of Hyderabad. I guessed the price for the job would be Rs 10, or maximum 15. I haven’t seen much variation in cobbler’s charges across India. It was Mumbai first where I saw lady-cobblers; otherwise the job belongs to men in much of North India. I thought the job was slightly less demanding especially when you have a reserved small shop on the foot-path, and hence the trend would be for men to have more demanding jobs and women to occupy their place – at least in the cities. Anyways, she was doing her job and something was going on in my mind. Those days I was trying to find means to do something for the poor. I wondered if I should offer her a hundred rupee note. What if she used it to buy alcohol for herself? Should I ask her if she had young children in school and then help her with something specifically for them? My chain of thoughts got a break when I heard, “Rs 25”. What? “Rupee 25 is too much. Take Rs 10; it should be fair.” 


To my surprise, she protested strongly. She started explaining about the job done which I showed to her was not much. Still, I gave her Rs 20. She said she won’t leave the remaining Rs 5. Then she commented something interesting, “You people come from UP (Uttar Pradesh) to Hyderabad and want to dictate me what should be the charge?” So it was about exploiting the “outsiders”? I got angry and asked her why she was bringing “UP” in between? If she asked Rs 100 for the job, should I give it to her only because I came from outside Hyderabad? She took a backseat hearing this. By the time two other ladies had also come to the shop and they became uncomfortable, perhaps thinking if they would also be charged exorbitantly. Anyways, I left her place after saying that I won’t give more than 20 and she could do whatever she wanted. Moments before leaving, I gave her a last glance and bewildered because I saw a “fun” in her eyes. May be such demands and encounters were “regular” for her.  


Should I have given in to her demand? After all, Rs 5 or Rs 25 was not a big sum! I know that most of the street vendors are poor, but am I wrong if I expect a bit of integrity from them? And her comments on “you having come from UP” definitely gave the indication that she was treating me discriminately! Also, if people like me start giving her double the usual price, won’t she start demanding the same high price from the really poor customers too? That would be really bad. Anyways, I don’t know what I learnt from the experience, because such things happen many times in all places in this world. But one thing for sure: it broke my “charity bubble”.  


- Rahul

Karva Chauth and Feminists

October 30th, 2010
Comments Off


A conversation between a feminist (Q) and a reformed-feminist (Me): 


Q: You told me that yesterday was Karva Chauth and your wife kept a fast for you. Did you too keep a fast for her?  


Me: Yes, but for one hour. When I came to know that she had not been able to see the moon and break her fast, though I was too hungry, I waited until she broke her fast. So in a way, I kept a fast for her too.  


Q: That may be incidental. Why is it so that only women have to keep such fasts? Why don’t men keep such fasts?  


Me: We have to understand how these festivals came into being in our society. Such festivals and customs are basically traditions. Traditionally men used to go to faraway places for their work or to earn money and hence such fasts would be inconvenient for them. Women stayed at home and hence could do the fasting, in order to show their love for their husbands. And hence mainly women keep fast, traditionally. Today, we still follow the same practice but if the lady is working and doesn’t find comfortable to do it, no one can force her. But still many women keep such fast as a token of their conjugal love.  


Q: So men don’t need to show their love, and only women need to show?  


Me: Men and women show their love in different ways and both make different gestures to show their love for each other. There is no harm in this; as a man doesn’t need to copy a woman and the vice versa, in order to prove they are equal.  


Q: Should only women keep practicing such customs forever or a change would come?  


Me: I would love to see men reciprocate the symbols of love or customs for their wives too. Personally I don’t like fasting for any reason and hence I may not love to maintain this custom, but there is no harm and only good if husbands keep fast for their wives too. I would be delighted to see that happening.  


Q: I find such festivals like Karva Chauth very stupid! These are made only to subjugate and suppress women, and to maintain god like stature for men.  


Me: I will tell you my experience. What did I feel when I came to know that my wife had kept Karva Chauth vrat (fast) for me? I felt humble. It was a nice and humbling feeling to know how much your wife loves you and that is why she has kept this fast for you. I supported her to maintain it properly. Such experiences only take mutual love to higher levels. I don’t see anything wrong but only good in such customs and festivals. May be at one time these festivals were maintained for some other reasons. But today, most of Hindu festivals still find relevance because their intent is good. Their inspiration is good. It is very essential to have a healthy and trusting relationship between a husband and his wife and such customs are nothing but gestures to strengthen them. I say that such festivals which give either of them an opportunity to show how much she/he cares for the other, are really nice.  


Q: What about the stupid stories behind these festivals? Many of them can’t be real.  


Me: Look at the inspirations and intentions behind them. I feel most of the stories and legends in Hinduism are great stories told in symbolism. Their content may belong to a different era or a different world, but their intentions are really benefitting and their messages are still very much relevant for our present generations. Dashahra is celebrated as a victory of good over evil; Diwali is celebrated as destroying darkness of ignorance by light of knowledge; Holika is burnt as a symbol of burning our desires; and then so many festivals symbolically make us respect our nature and mother earth – and I believe all these festivals give us a very relevant message for our generation too. This is why these festivals have survived for centuries. They are connected with the roots of our culture and social fiber. If a festival requires you to worship your parents as bhagwan – I see only good in it. For a festival of Raksha-bandhan, will you see it as a symbol of establishing female weakness (because she is asking her brother to protect her), or will you see it as an expression of bonding between siblings? I will prefer the later.  


Q: So you recommend such old customs to continue for future generations too?  


Me: Why now? If we understand their true intentions and can see that they are harmless and would only result in a healthier society, there is no harm in maintaining them forever.  


Post Script: I called myself a “reformed-feminist” because once I thought I was a feminist and then I feel I grew up. In the spirit of becoming a feminist one doesn’t need to become as biased as male-chauvinists are. And if feminism makes you see violence at places where there is only love, we should better choose be happy without it. 

- Rahul

A Take on Dowry System

October 24th, 2010
Comments Off

Many people demonize dowry system and can’t say anything about it other than monotonous criticism. Here is my quick take on the system in which bride’s parents give a sum of money to the groom’s side at the time of their marriage. This often happens by demand – boy’s side fixing the amount and groom’s side can either pay up or leave the proposal – or else it can happen voluntarily.  


When we come to the criticism of dowry, let us remember that most often the same parents who criticize dowry when asked for their daughters, demand dowry for their sons. Is it not hypocrisy? Of course yes it is.  


Going to the roots, I think the dowry system is a social evil for which none of us are responsible for, personally. The system was symbolic in the ancient India because women were seen as bhagya Lakshmi – goddess of wealth, purity and fortune. I think the system became ugly when the Muslim rule came. Hindus and all natives were harassed and became poor - and marriage served purpose for them to show off their social status - a false pride - by taking money from the girl’s side. Once the situation changes, as it is already happening now, dowry system would go away.  


Also, let us understand that it is not possible for individuals to protest and come out of this system all of a sudden. I would like to share a personal experience with you. The boy didn’t take dowry, but the girl’s side spread a rumor in the society that they had given 12 lakhs of ‘dahej’; in order to enhance their social status. So let us remember that it is not only the boy’s side that uses dowry to show off its high social status - it is the girl’s side too which equally boosts the high dowry paid in order to enhance its social prestige and pride. Therefore, I think we can’t blindly blame only the boy’s side for the dowry system.  


I would also like to make two other points on the same page. (1) Harassing brides for dowry is a completely different matter than dowry system; because domestic violence can happen because of a plethora of reasons and insufficient dowry is often made a ‘justification’ for such harassments. Government should be severe in such cases and the guilty should be brought to justice pn priority because dowry-harassments are often contagious – it becomes a norm after some time. (2) Often dowry is given as part of division of family wealth. So in many families daughters are given their ‘share’ at the time of marriage, while sons are given their share after death of parents. This system takes dowry into a completely different plane, as part of a wider and somewhat fair social system.  


I think dowry system would go away with time sooner or later, just like it had seeped into our social system. And it would be for the good of all. 


- Rahul 


PS: I don’t know if it is an appropriate revelation here, but I didn’t ask for dowry at the time of my marriage. But I see the practice as part of a wider social system and at times I don’t find it completely evil.

Please Vote for Anuradha Koirala

October 22nd, 2010
Comments Off


CNN has selected 10 individuals as Top 10 CNN Heroes out of which it would select one as the “2010 CNN Hero of the Year”. You can vote to select one.  


There is only one Indian who features on the list – Narayanan Krishnan who quit as a chef with a five star chain to feed poor and destitute. I voted for Krishnan. But I saw that we could vote for more than one! 


And I voted for Anuradha Koirala. I found her work and life more valuable than anyone else. Read here:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/04/29/cnnheroes.koirala.nepal/ 
 


Even if we feel proud to be Indian, we should support her cause, because it is India where most of sex-trafficking victims are transported to (Report said 10,000-15,000 of them are trafficked to India every year); or through India to other countries including Middle-east.  


Do vote for Anuradha Koirala: http://heroes.cnn.com/vote.aspx  


Let us free our earth from evil human-trafficking.  


- Rahul  


P.S. You can even think about supporting her NGO:

http://www.maitinepal.org/pages.php?option=Support

Big Flattering

October 11th, 2010
Comments Off


I saw a scene from the recent edition of Big Boss. One participant was asked to describe his other inmates in a single word each. The words he chose were interesting. I noted that he used very flattering words to describe each lady inmate. He used words like “naughty”, “kind”, and even “angel” for them. For men he was blunt and used words like “double faced”, “back stabber”, and many other negative words. Though there were one or two ladies he criticized and men he hailed too, the pattern was so clear. All women in the house couldn’t be only nice, and most of men couldn’t be only of negative character. The way he described them also clearly indicated about his own approach and his own character.  


I think to treat a woman nicely, just because she is a woman, is also an injustice to her. It is high time people like the participant described above learn that ‘flattering women’ is not a necessary or sufficient criteria to be called a ‘gentleman’.  


- Rahul

Seeking Attention

March 24th, 2010
Comments Off

This comes from a real life incident that happened recently.  


We visited their home after a long gap. The only kid in the family was naturally the centre of our attraction. After some initial period of pause, the boy opened up and started playing with the guests. He was chatting, showing off his toys and running around. It was then that his grandfather arrived from his morning walk. As the old grandpa sat down and started talking with the visitors, we noticed something unusual. While the kiddo was mixing up well with the guests and also talked some times to his parents, it so happened that about ten minutes had passed and the kid didn’t talk to the grandpa even once. He seemed to be too excited to see the visitors and was engaged in other things, and hence naturally forgot the need to talk to his grandpa at that time.  


Now there he was running and passing in front of the grandpa, still not looking at him. What happened next was shocking. We saw grandpa raising his one leg and catching the kid unaware. As the kid fell down, grandpa raised his other leg and caught hold of him. The kid, realising that he had fell down and his fun had come to an interruption, started crying. Now grandpa got up, pulled the kid up in his arms, wiped out tears from his cheeks and played with him to stop his crying. The kiddo still said in his hurt and tears: “grandpa made me fell down…” But grandpa seemed happy and content now. What I quickly analysed the incident into, was a very sad realisation.  


It seemed to me that the grandpa was an absolute self-satisfying attention seeker. When the kid whom he loved so much didn’t give him any attention, he created a situation where the kid had to be consoled by him and hence he would get enough importance that he thought he deserved. Was it because he, a retired professional, was missing his ‘important’ days on job? Or was it his true nature where he craved for attention from others and if not provided gratification, would do ‘something’ to fetch it for him? I remember a piece of news from some place in Europe where an elderly couple had a unique and perverted case. The husband kept administering a kind of poison to his wife for years, so that she kept on felling sick and he got chance to nurse her! Their marriage was not going on very well and he had devised this method for them to come ‘close’… It seemed to me that a similar game was put on here in front of us. The child was made to pay enough attention and importance by being interrupted and harmed, and the retired grandpa didn’t miss such an opportunity to fetch out some moments of gratification for him. While all of us know how children cry and create scenes seeking attention of elders, this case of a similar but more perverse behaviour from an old man made me wonder.  


Of course truth is more interesting than fiction. 


- Rahul


 

Apartheid and India

January 25th, 2010
Comments Off

I saw a friend using the term ‘apartheid’ to describe the prevailing caste-based reservation system in India. I wondered if this term is applicable in Indian case and tried to read more into the term.  


I found the word meaning of Apartheid: (Ref: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/apartheid 


a·part·heid (-pärtht, -ht)


n. 


1. An official policy of racial segregation formerly practiced in the Republic of South Africa, involving political, legal, and economic discrimination against nonwhites.


2. A policy or practice of separating or segregating groups.


3. The condition of being separated from others; segregation. 


To know more, I got to read what the term ‘apartheid’ stands in relation to politics and government: (Ref: http://www.answers.com/topic/apartheid) 


apartheid


n


(Government, Politics & Diplomacy) (in South Africa) the official government policy of racial segregation; officially renounced in 1992 


apartheid  


Policy of racial segregation and political and economic discrimination against non-European groups in South Africa. The term was first used as the name of the official policy of the National Party in 1948, though racial segregation, sanctioned by law, was already widely practiced. The Group Areas Act of 1950 established residential and business sectors in urban areas for each “race” and strengthened the existing “pass” laws, which required nonwhites to carry identification papers. Other laws forbade most social contacts between those of European descent and others, authorized segregated public facilities, established separate educational standards, restricted each group to certain types of jobs, curtailed nonwhite labour unions, denied nonwhite participation in the national government, and established various black African “homelands,” partly self-governing units that were nevertheless politically and economically dependent on South Africa. These so-called homelands were not recognized by international governments. Apartheid was always subject to internal criticism and led to many violent protests, strikes, and acts of sabotage; it also received international censure. In 1990 – 91 most apartheid legislation was repealed, but segregation continued on a de facto basis. In 1993 a new constitution enfranchised blacks and other racial groups, and all-race national elections in 1994 produced a coalition government with a black majority. These developments marked the end of legislated apartheid, though not of its entrenched social and economic effects. 


So the question is: Does India practice apartheid? Does the government’s policy of caste based reservation qualifies itself to be called ‘apartheid’? 


I think it depends on how we define the term. If we define it in social sense, like “the condition of being separated from others; segregation”, then the term becomes too vague. Even if we define it in terms of general policy / social use, then all nations have been practicing apartheid (if called so) in some form or the other; and in all ages. Even the Muslim rulers in India discriminated against Hindus and hence it was apartheid. Even the British treated native people differently and hence it was apartheid (though the British racial discrimination against brown/black Indians had elements of true apartheid by definition). Even the Christians when they claim “only Jesus is true god” do apartheid because they divide this world into believers and non-believers. Then we can stretch it to the things like saying governments do apartheid when they come out with “below poverty line” segmentation. Or, even by creating states within India, govt does apartheid. I think such stretch is illogical. So we have to define apartheid only in terms of its political meaning. 


And when it comes to political meaning, apartheid is what the White Govt in South Africa practiced against Black natives!  


I think we should not “loosely” apply this term against Government of India. GOI does caste and religion related discrimination in the form of reservations in jobs and studies, but it is not exactly “apartheid”. On the other side of thinking, even the discriminatory caste-system followed by Indians or discrimination against so called dalits is not apartheid. We Indians should be careful in application of this term. 


- Rahul

Caste of Women Post Marriage

January 25th, 2010
Comments Off

Two days back, Bombay High Court made a controversial ruling.  


Marriage doesn’t change a woman’s caste, rules HC 


Hetal Vyas / DNASaturday, January 23, 2010 0:14 IST 


A woman’s caste does not change after marriage, the Bombay high court has ruled.  


The order came on Friday on the hearing of an application by Mumbai resident Rajendra Shrivastava, who had sought anticipatory bail after his wife, a scheduled caste, accused him and her in-laws of dowry harassment and ‘casteist atrocities’. 


Shrivastava said that since the woman was married to him, a forward caste man, she could not seek protection or benefits under the Prevention of Atrocities Act (PAA), 1989. 


But the bench of justices BH Marlapalle, Abhay Oka and RY Ganoo did not agree. 


It said: When a woman born in a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe (SC/ST) marries a person belonging to a forward caste, her caste does not change.  


An SC/ST person suffers from disadvantages and indignities just because he or she is born into a particular caste, which he or she acquires involuntarily on birth.  


The suffering of such a person is not wiped out by marriage to a person born in a forward caste. The SC/ST label continues notwithstanding marriage. 


Ref - http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_marriage-doesn-t-change-a-woman-s-caste-rules-h_1338153


 


I think the court is making a mistake here. No one says the indignities of a person from so called lower caste is “wiped out” (wiping out indicates towards making null the atrocities done in the past), but the petition here was for whether such a person should keep getting benefits of the law applicable for her even “post marriage” (when the woman was accepted in the family of a so called higher caste and also acquired new surname)?  


This issue is tricky. If the court says a person will never lose/change his/her caste status that s/he acquired by virtue of birth; then it’s sad and a hopeless situation. I don’t think the court of law should pass such a harsh verdict, confining a person with status acquired by birth.  


Such a verdict will also make men avoid marrying inter-caste to women from SC/ST communities - in order to avoid potential legal actions. If a husband and wife fight and the wife files a case under Prevention of Atrocities Act (SC/ST), the man’s future may get doomed.  


I think such harsh laws should not be applicable for marital disputes. If the man had married the woman, he would have considered her as ‘equal’. If he changed his mind afterwards, then also such cases could be filed under normal human rights laws (e.g. Protection of Civil Rights Act), not necessarily PAA (Prevention of Atrocities Act). The only situation where this rule may deem fit to be applied is when atrocities are made against the woman by her in-laws and relatives. Some times a man from so called higher caste marries a woman from so called lower caste without honest consent from his parents and relatives. In such cases, the bride may have to bear atrocities in hands of her in-laws, because of her previous caste. But husbands should be spared from this act.



I think PAA should not be applicable under marital disputes; otherwise there are high chances that this law would be misused by aggrieved women and it would discourage inter-caste marriages. 


- Rahul

What is her Tradition?

December 21st, 2009
Comments Off

Sometimes, reality is more interesting than fiction.  


We were to celebrate Traditional Day in office, the next day. We had received an email asking colleagues to come in the traditional attire. Last time we had celebrated it, it was a fun day which had ended with prizes being given to the best (traditionally) dressed males and females. A lot of men had come in colorful Kurta-Pajamas. Ladies were the real flag bearers: they had come in sarees and varieties of them. A Bengali lady and a Keralite lady – their sarees and appearance gave glimpses of our unity in diversity.  


As the day had started with this news about next day being a Traditional Day, some of us got into talking about it. The lady who sits in a cubicle next to me, made my day. She is a Christian. Having read this email, she stood up from her desk. She looked around for some favorite faces. After some time, she found one other colleague from another department, whose name indicated he was also a Christian. “What is our traditional dress S(name)…?”, she asked. His reply was equally amusing. He asked in return, “I think you are Catholic, right?” Now she looked disappointed a bit; as the guy was a Christian but not a Catholic Christian.  


I think she never got the answer for her question: “What is her traditional dress”? 


Religious converts give up the traditions of their ancestors and break eternal chains of cultural propagation. What is their tradition?  


(Rahul)

Bachna Jaruri Hai

August 29th, 2009
Comments Off

(Society)

Serial Something

In the recently released Love Aaj Kal, Saif Ali Khan plays the role of a 'serial lover' who changes his girlfriends as a rule. Before that, Ranvir Kapoor played a character in Bachna Ai Haseenon who chases and pursues girls as a challenge, then dumps them for fun. The emotional devastation that his games incur on the girl Mahi was played in such a touching way by Manissha Lamba. Now the worst thing is that these cases and such guys are not only in the movies. They might be sitting right across our table.

Recently I came to know one guy who shared his interesting time-pass. He can't marry for some years because his present job and salary are not good enough. In the meanwhile he has found a way out for his recreation. He searches for girls open for friendships in matrimony and some social-networking websites. He chats with them, talks with them over phone, and then proposes to meet them too. All this is done with the intention to get to 'know' each other better. These days many girls are willing to search for their spouses by themselves and hence don't find something wrong in such dating. Some of the girls would agree to meet and they would see places together. Now after every 2-3 months, he would make some genuine looking excuses to the girl, making it appear that their marriage won't be possible and hence they have to 'move on'. Next morning: another girl. Three months afterwards: his next victim. He would definitely break some hearts in the process and would fake some love. May be he has become too perfect in his 'art' of 'falling in love' and enjoys the process of 'getting to know' each other.

Why am I writing this? Because I felt too bad coming to know about all this happening in our society. Why I am sharing this? Because we can better be watchful

(Rahul)

Some Ratios

December 13th, 2008

This morning while going through some statistics, I fumbled upon something very interesting. Explaining the figures is fun. These statistics are taken from CIA fact book and are of 2008 estimate.

 

The absolute figures as such make it very evident that India, China and the US are in an ascending order of growth stage. Let us compare the trend in terms of male vs. female.

 

Interpretations of the statistics are solely mine; you can contribute, add and point out mistakes if any.

 

Infant mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births)

 

India              China            USA

 

Male                          36.94        19.43        6.95

Female                      27.12        23.08        5.62

 

Male child has a higher mortality rate at birth than a female child. The trend is miraculously reversed in China, where more females die while taking birth. To some extent this can be attributed to the widespread female infanticide prevalent there and to the government's one-child policy. In general people believe that a female child is biologically stronger than males to survive difficult times.

 

Life expectancy at birth (years)

 

India              China            USA

 

Male                          66.87        71.37        75.29

Female                      71.9          75.18        81.13

 

Females in general live longer than males. To some extent this can be explained by the fact that males involve in riskier jobs like armed forces, sailing, etc while women involve in jobs which are physically less risky. Also, men in general are more involved in unhealthy lifestyle and practices like resorting to drugs, and involvement in crimes, and this should also reflect here.

 

Median age (years)

 

India              China            USA

 

Male`                        24.7          33.1          35.4

Female                      25.5          34.2          38.1

 

These are clearly in agreement with the previous statistics ' life expectancy at birth. Women on an average are older than men, because they live longer. (It is interesting to note that China's reverse statistic has become normal here.)

 

Sex ratio (males / female)

 

India            China            USA

 

At birth                     1.12         1.11          1.05

Under 15 years          1.1           1.13          1.05

15-64 years               1.06         1.06          1

65 years and over      0.9           0.91          0.72

 

Total population         1.06         1.06          0.97

 

The society where the sex ratio is closer to 1.00 is more equal and is expected to be less discriminating to the girl child. The ratio of US is good, because it remains same at birth and under 15 years of age, meaning there is no discrimination against girl child. It reduces a little afterwards and is 1 at 64 years of age, the ideal. Ratio of China still sends signals of female infanticide and killing or trafficking of girl child, or at least discrimination on healthcare front, since its ratio increases from birth to under 15 years of age. The ratio of India decreases throughout the life cycle meaning males dying outnumber females, and hence the ratio is decreasing. This is in consonance with the life-expectancy-at-birth also.

 

Ideally, all these ratios should be equal for males and females. The US is much more ahead on all human development parameters. China sends signals of discrimination and infanticide against females. India though poorest on all parameters among the three, still is not as discriminating against the girl child. There is a long way to go

Accepting the unacceptable?

August 20th, 2008

Society

 

Good guys do it like Sachin does

 

I was not comfortable posting this picture here, since many a times, too much righteousness backfires and makes readers search for some contradictions in the author himself. But I am ready to take the risk :)

 

Once, one of our professors asked the girl students to share if they had faced some kind of harassment in public. One girl told us how once she had to shout at and force a guy to retreat who was not giving her enough space to sit in a bus. Now a day, this very girl hangs out with some 'cool' guys in the campus who are jovial and funny. These guys, once in a while, break dirty jokes in her presence. And she doesn't know how to react! She can't enjoy those, and she doesn't even believe her chiding will change them. Hence, she has to live with such things. It makes me wonder if we have two sets of rules ' do we accept the unacceptable things when they come from the people we like

 

I am also surprised at my female friends who take it as accepted thing that boys will 'look away' even when they are committed. I had said once, "Our thoughts and feelings don't have logic, but our actions have!" Feeling attracted is one thing, making advances, or to ogle is another. And in the end, when the guys come to know that the 'guy things' are accepted by all ' will not they take it for granted and move on for more?

 

Some days back, I went to attend an interactive session by the famous writer Chetan Bhagat. Someone from the audience asked him why his lead characters were always boys. He, being a very honest man, replied, "I'm actually not sure about how girls feel and think, so I don't develop the female characters much". Fine? Next, a girl asked why his books showed girls asking for or accepting sex before their marriage. His reply was something like this: "I think we all dream about that, so what is wrong if my books show them happening?" Well, there are things that we may dream about, but it won't be called boldness if we go on realising them. And here also, one old-generation question should be able to pinch him: "What if that girl was your daughter?" I know it is fiction and fiction doesn't need any censorship. But we can't go on glorifying one part of fiction as real and another part as real fiction! And someone who thinks himself to represent the generation Y should not only care about their 'dreams', but also about their 'directions'.   

 

In fact, each and every society has some words and ways to show women down and make them appear as 'items'. It is irrespective of country, language or culture. But what makes me wonder is the great extent to which we are beginning to accept these things as normal.

 

Tell these cricketers (including that cute Yuvi): All of us can't play as well as Sachin does. But we all can become a gentleman like him!

 

Rules Broken!

April 15th, 2008

Society

And now Rahul on Feminism?

As there is a lifecycle of everything, there is also a lifecycle of a blogger. Hence most of us go through very parallel thoughts at times, and write on similar issues. I have never felt any dearth of issues to write on, as you would have guessed till now. But one trend I have avoided so far ' to write on feminism. This piece doesn't exactly fit into that category, but it is close :)

It is said, the biggest enemy of great is good. On similar lines I feel the biggest enemy of women are the 'supporters' of women. Here is how.

Often, in the name of proving that women are great or greater, they would make statements like "women are far better at XYZ kind of jobs than men", or "women are always better suited for ZYX kind of positions". Women also get to think on that pattern. And hence, a large number of them take up teaching, R&D and HR & Administration jobs, and making use of their 'proven better' skills. This is where the trap lies.

Here, I quote a para from my text book:

It is often declared that since women have only recently embarked on careers and entered the managerial ranks, it would take more time for them to rise to the top-executive positions. However, many women in higher middle management positions feel that there are at least two major stumbling blocks to their advancement: gender role stereotypes and inadequate access to critical information (Crosby, 1985, Daniel, 1998; Welch, 2001).

Gender stereotypes or sex-role stereotypes are societal beliefs that women are more suited for taking on nurturing and helping roles, whereas men are better fitted for taking on leadership roles and positions of authority and power (Eagly, 1989; Kahn & Crosby, 1998; Smith, 1999). These beliefs influence the positions that are assigned to organisational members. Whereas capable men are given line positions and developed to take on higher responsibilities and executive roles in the course of time, capable women are assigned to staff positions and dead-end jobs. With little exposure to management of budgets and opportunities for significant decision making, women are seldom groomed for top-level positions. Thus, sex-role stereotypes hinder the progress of women to the top.

I hope you understood exactly what I wanted to convey. Time for some examples… Many of my class-mates during my Chemical Engineering went to work in the industry. And they are doing good. One of them was posted in a plant. Did she find it difficult to work there? Yes. She had to visit onsite in a factory setup. But for how long? As she got a promotion, she got someone else working under her, and she doesn't need to visit plant sites often. Had she chosen to play a 'girl' and asked her company to transfer her to an R&D job, she would have got it easy. But choosing to work in a male bastion, she chose the path where her profile would be as good as any male engineer in her company. Among the many things I respect about her ' this decision of hers is most prominent.

I worked in a manufacturing plant for two years. In our Indian plants of our MNC, there were no women employees. But my job position was held by a girl in one of our Malaysian plants. She told us how curious workers were initially, when she removed her safety-helmet to show her long hair :) I believe her decision to play it hard will pay off. As she grows in higher positions, no male would be able to accuse her of having inadequate field experience. She will be as good as any other male officer in her company.

Even among very well educated families, there is a view that girls should take up either teaching/lecturing jobs or some other positions where their physical comfort is ensured. Well, to be honest I would also think on the lines when it comes to the case of my sisters, but that won't be a final word :) If we accept this as a fact, we won't have any right to complain that there are few women in top positions in Indian companies.

The cycle would go on like this: women won't take up positions which would be physically demanding, and then they would be over-looked for promotions. Many years later, they would be still stuck up on their jobs and positions which would never lead to the CEO's chair. And then the blame-game would start, even to the extent of accusations of sexual discrimination or a demand for reservations for women. The fact is that industry is competitive ' and you have to play it game!

Here is my final word ' don't fall into the trap. Check it if you yourself promote gender role stereotypes If you do ' then take care not to. Break all barriers. No one was made a superior or inferior ' it is our own decisions that lead us to become like one.

Picture: ‘Dare’ is the word, not ‘Care’