One simple but quite effective way is to refer to a book, article or web resource by a famous, "authoritative", and "highly regarded" feminist. You will soon see yourself that the "problems" they are shouting to have been facing are really faced by men; not by women. This way one may easily identify men's problems if one is not carried away by their "wind" and if one has independent thinking capability which does not get affected by their "main stream" thinking, although this methodology can't be considered a universal tool to identify men's problems.

Now, somebody asked me to give a thought about how men can handle evil women. Awareness among men could be a first step in the right direction. Although the goal is very far, "a thousand miles journey begins with a step".

Somebody told that the number of men harassed is less than the number of women harassed. If I were to adopt the "feminist" style, "What is the percentage cut off for the harassment to be qualified as "more"? How can you PROVE that men are LESS harassed?"
Now if I adopt the humble style of a contemporary man, still I can say "Take the number of women harassed and the number of feminists, feminist writers, quantity of published feminist literature; same way write down the number of men harassed, number of people who write about men's issues and corresponding literature; Now from these figures, don't you think the contemporary men don't have any voice and men's issues are hardly expressed and need expression? Moreover, in the present fast moving world, the "movement" during one year can be more than the "movement" during hundred years of a previous century; so, if men lag by one year in the present world, it could be equivalent to a lag of hundred years in previous centuries; so, pushing men down on account of the so called pushing down of women in olden days can not be justified since this "pushing down men for revenge" does much more than just taking a "just revenge"; moreover, it is not quite right to take revenge on men for their so called earlier faults if everybody believes in the happiness and equality for ALL; taking revenge may only tend to make the pendulum swing to and fro."

Someone asked "which man is burnt alive for dowry?"
First answer me, "which innocent woman is convicted of dowry harassment case? Which good woman is accused of sexual harassment? Which woman has been roared at for righting about women's issues?"

Someone told "if someone speaks harsh against women, it will remain in their mind"
I can say that men have better hearts; why all expect men to become heartless brutes? Just because if they MAKE men heartless, then men can be proved heartless, they can be scorned, their harassment may be justified, they may be punished and hence women can get "enjoyment"?

Finally someone asked "you are righting like this because you can't face women in the work place?"
I would like to say: "Do you think there is the slightest possibility that a person who can write like this can ever be less competent than flirtatious and carefree girls?"

To illustrate how modern superstitions can affect our daily lives, take the word “adolescence”. Every “rational” person in the contemporary society agrees that there is a stage called “adolescence” in human life. But see the fact here (copied from a web archive on sexology):

“Adolescence: The period between the beginning of puberty and adulthood.
The phenomenon of adolescence as we know it today is the result of certain social and historical developments. “Pre-civilized” cultures do not know an adolescence in the modern sense of the word, but use so-called puberty or initiation rites by which they confer the status of adults on their children as soon as these have reached a certain age (usually between 12 and 14 years). This means that, in these cultures, the period of transition from childhood to adulthood is very short. The same was true for our own culture in ancient times. The traditional customs from that period live on in contemporary religious ceremonies, such as the bar mitzwah and the Catholic and Protestant confirmations. However, with the development and growing complexity of civilization, the transitional period between puberty and adulthood has gradually become longer until, as in many contemporary societies, it now extends well over 10 years and more. It is not impossible that, in the future, the period of adolescence will last even longer. As is obvious from this short sketch, adolescence is less a biological than a cultural phenomenon.”

If you don’t mind, the link for the above is:
http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/GESUND/ARCHIV/CDS.HTM

First, I apologize for hurting any woman whose conscience says that they are not the kind of "women" I am talking about and if they really feel that they belong to a perfectly opposite category (though I don't think there are many such women in the world).

Now, somebody told that what I wrote about men were all isolated incidents. Perfectly not! I wrote "rape accused are usually beaten by several people for hours". Here "many people" does not refer to "mob"; it refers to police men. You can verify this by actually
verifying facts from a police station. But rape cases are rare; you have to wait and check this fact. One can say that the law of the land does not allow this; but just because the law does not permit this, we cannot ignore the facts or say such things don't happen. And this may not happen if the accused is a famous person. If a person is caught for pick pocketing, he is usually beaten for about half an hour by 2-3 people; he can not walk; some of his bones may break because of which he may not be able to properly do his daily works in future; does the law of the land permit this? No. But we all know that these are all very "common" things and since they are so "common", we do not tend to worry about them.

Somebody told that the tortures employed in Tihar jail were isolated incidents. A few years ago Editor in chief of a Kannada weekly (Taranga) wrote in one of his editorials which explained the state of jails in general and Tihar jail in particular. His editorials were always based on elaborated studies and research and they were highly acclaimed editorials and were considered authoritative by all. He wrote like this (about Tihar jail): "Forget rollers and aeroplanes; they are very common; tortures like fully filling the anus of inmates with chilly powder and taking sadist pleasure seeing the inmates writhing with pain are very common here." It is a well known fact that police cut some part near the feet so that prisoners can no longer run and escape for ever. Rowdies get their tongues chopped off; what about encounters? Do you know the number of custodial deaths per year? Recently a person was caught by the police in Bangalore for "eave teasing" and he was beaten so harshly that he died in the police custody. There are several other torture methods which are very common but I can not mention all of them, in detail, here, e.g., burning with cigarettes. One student (in Karnataka) appeared for exams on behalf of another student and was caught; what the police did?; police came with a knife to cut his genitals!

Yes! All these are very common in this "modern", "civilized", "21st century". The situation is worse in third worlds like Africa. What about America? You know how these "cultured" and "civilized" people tortured Iraqi prisoners; haven't you seen the photograph of a UK woman pulling a naked male Iraqi prisoner a few years back? You would have shouted with all your voice if such things ever happened to any single woman in the world. As per a first hand account from a soldier from Indian Army "We caught an enemy person; we dipped him in the boiling water which was so hot that steam was coming out of the water; but still he didn't reveal any of their secrets; he was so patriotic about his nation". Who knows whether that poor fellow knew any single secret so that he could reveal that during the torture.


Now, had I wrote that there is child abuse in India, all the contemporary "good" people would have roared against me telling that such a thing is unimaginable in our "great" nation except a very few "isolated" incidents. Now all of you know from the survey (which was announced in the newspapers recently) that nearly 50% of children in India are abused; it also mentioned that boys are subjected to more physical abuse compared to girls (but this information was pushed to the last line; see the politics here also!)

Now, I expect ideal women and women supporters to say: "These tortures may be there; so what?; these culprits deserve these kinds of punishments; there is nothing wrong in taking law into hands in these incidents; these tortures must be legalized; why do you worry about that?"

What I am trying to say is that while you are so sadist and so happy about these tortures, I am definitely not going to talk against these; "Why should I worry about these?" (as long as I am not affected by them? But, all I want from you people is to agree that these people have got enough punishments; I am against the insincerity which argues that these people didn't get "sufficient" punishment, even after undergoing such heinous tortures.

I have heard the popular saying "A woman is a woman's enemy". But it is not quite valid these days. This "modern popular saying" may probably best describe the current situation: "A man is a man's enemy; a woman is also a man's enemy; women are women supporters; also, men are women supporters"

Somebody told me: "Why can't you implement in your life what you are telling in your blogs?" I would like to clarify that my blogs are results of my life. Hence where is the need for my life to become a result of my blogs?

Somebody commented that I was writing these blogs because I was after cheap popularity; I invite anybody to come forward to publish these in your name and you need not give any credits to me; I will only be happy if you publish books on this theme and embed my blogs in those books too; I can even deleted my blogs which are in my name, if I am convinced that someone does that. Of course, although for some people these blogs themselves are unnecessarily lengthy (someone told: you take 100 words to tell something which requires only 10 words), for some others, these blogs are too short to comprehend and hence they in fact need many book volumes on these themes to fully get an idea of what I am saying and to get all their doubts clarified, to get all my arguments proved (somebody told: I don't understand the difference between a "dream society" and a "dream world").

Now I am expecting somebody to ask: "Don't you have any other work to do? Why are you singing your usual song always?"
What I would like to point out is that these things are relevant now more than ever before.
Recently one of the world top economic bodies told: "Never in the history of mankind the gap between rich and poor has been as large as it is now". But according to our modern superstition: "In earlier days there was a lot of gap between rich and poor; now in the modern world this gap has been reducing"
Now, the real thing is: "Never in the history of mankind the gap between women and men has been as large as it is now". But according to our modern superstition: "In olden days, condition of women was not good; now the things are improving". To clarify the first statement (i.e., the real thing): "Even in olden days women used to dominate men; but now this dominance is increasing at least exponentially". Hence the subject I am talking about is relevant now more than ever before. Somebody wrote: "It took 100 years for women to come out of the kitchen". I agree that women didn't have the privilege of sitting in front of a computer even just hundred years back. But may I draw your kind attention to the fact that many men didn't have the privilege of sitting in front of a computer even just 25 years back? While women were comfortably inside the kitchen, men were ploughing the ground under the sun. While privileged men (like kings) had a good life, privileged women (like queens) also had a good life (but kings had to fight wars, get wounded). One cannot compare Bill Gates with a beggar woman and say that men are privileged than women. Just think of Bill Gates working very hard in his office while his wife eats ice cream with other men, chatting and laughing (this is just a guess); and after returning home, it is "chauvinism" if he talks anything about her eating ice cream; and she will nag him telling that he drank coffee with his secretary, even though he drank coffee with his secretary very seriously; Poor Bill Gates! Also, even if a man chooses to be inside the kitchen, he doesn't have that option while women have the option of either staying inside or outside the kitchen and they even have the option to switch between the two.

So nobody saw these facts?
A few years back "Frontline" published a cover page article detailing how girls are dominating boys in the contemporary society. There is a group of men who assist men in getting free legal help for harassed husbands. In the West, there are a few groups who fight for men's rights. Many authors, poets, big figures in literature (both men and women) talk about these things indirectly or by giving these a humorous touch (they don't want to go directly against their time). One famous woman from Bollywood told in her article: "Sexual harassment is not restricted to harassment of girls by boys; in the present world, the opposite is also true; usually "small boys" are caught; catch big boys, if you can; it will be even better and interesting if you could catch "big girls"". Recently one researcher found out that condition of male prostitutes is much worse than the condition of female prostitutes; interestingly, the person is a woman from India; she also suggested different measures to bring them up. All authorities agree that the suffering of harassed men is more drastic compared to that of the harassed women, may be due to the attitude of the society towards men.

THIS WORLD IS A BIG FRAUD IN WHICH ALL MEN ARE FOOLED; THERE IS NO WAY FOR ANY MAN TO ESCAPE FROM THIS FRAUD WHETHER HE KNOWS ABOUT THIS FROUD OR NOT.

You will immediately ask: "Then, why, why, why are you wasting, wasting, wasting time writing these blogs???"
That is That is because the fraud is covered by another fraud. While the first fraud ensures that all men are made fools, this "covering fraud" ensures that all people believe men have an edge over women although the truth is otherwise. Although nobody can avoid the first fraud, I believe that the second "covering fraud" may be avoided, if we can move the mountains; and I am hopeful that it may be possible to avoid this "covering fraud" because somebody told "we can move mountains if we really wish"!
So, the main purpose of my blogs is to make an infinitesimally small contribution towards melting this outer "covering fraud" so that all can clearly see the inner fraud, though nothing could be done further to ward off the inner fraud.

So, there is no cure for men's problems (we can do nothing about the inner fraud); but there is treatment for men's problems (we can ward off the outer "covering fraud"); but since this treatment is too tedious, although not impossible, it is not feasible. So, what is the first aid at least? The FIRST AID FOR MEN'S PROBLEMS which I can think of now is:
MEN, YOU SPEAK OUT! ; OPENLY TELL ABOUT ALL YOUR PROBLEMS; DON'T BE AFRAID OF SHEDDING OFF THAT SELFDEVASTATING PSEUDOPRESTIGE; WHY A BEGGAR WHO DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING SHOULD BE AFRAID OF A ROBBERY?
AND WOMEN, SHUT YOUR MOUTHS PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE

When the whole world believed that the sun rotates round the earth, and when a person argued that the earth is really moving around the sun, he was branded “blasphemous” by the contemporary “good” people. The harsh comments to my earlier blogs are all well expected from our contemporary “reasonable” people. But STILL what I can say is that women DO have an upper hand over men in the contemporary society.

You are most welcome to comment on my blogs either favourably or otherwise; I won’t delete it. I had deleted comments from three people so far. Sorry for that. I will put them here (In all the three cases I had sent my replies to the respective people while deleting).
(1) Comment from “The Princess” was : “A woman can be a man most of the times but can a man be a woman for a single day?”
My reply was: “If a woman can be a man most of the times, a man CAN be a woman; but that will be possible only in my dream society”
(2) Comment from Nilesh was (for the blog:”What Dr. Johnson told might be correct?”): “The point no 6 apllies to either ways ,remember; your comments at the end of the blog suggest that only the people who commented your blogs favourably have rational thinking; Is it fair and right?”
(3)My reply to “Harmless Lawyer” may be found in his guest book; His comments may be got from his iland. Since his comments are too long and many in numbers, I can’t put them here.

I thank all who commented favourably or otherwise.

THE BEST COMMENT I saw was:”woman or man …does’nt matter… just look at them like humans… all will be fine … Nature made us to dwell together… its better for the man the woman and for humanity as a whole… ” .But sadly this has been implemented from mens’ side only.

I think many have misinterpreted my sentence:”it is better to be murdered while one is a feotus than to suffer the whole life of harassment”. What I am really intending to convey by this is:”Women are really lucky to be murdered while they are feotus while men are not killed while they are feotus forcing them to undergo a whole life of harassment”.

Also people tell “Is it possible for a man to give birth to a child?” What I can say is: “Is it possible for a woman alone to give birth to a child?”(human cloning is still not legal!)


NOW, by just reading a blog about mens’ rights, if people get so much irritated, can you just imagine the harassment men have to face while reading every news paper, magazine (since they have thousands of articles like this; but arguing about womens’ rights and no comments against them)? If it is irritating to just read my blogs what shoud be the frustration level of men who are made to sit hearing the speech by womens’ activists?

Finally, I would like to quote from the autobiography of Gandhi who was a good lawyer (these are not the exact words since I don’t have the copy of the book besides me now; don’t think that these are not the exact words translated from Gujarathi and hence incorrect; but the meaning is exactly the same): “Many a times wrong can be proved right and the right may be proved wrong by lawyers; but this is not the limitation of the subject “law” and it does not mean that the right is wrong and the wrong is right; it is the limitation of the advocate who argues in favour of right; if an able lawyer argues, it should be possible for the right to win” . SAME THING MAY BE APLLIED FOR BLOG. If I cannot properly “prove” what I am telling, it only indicates that I am not a good “advocate” but since what I am saying IS THE truth, a better advocate should be able to prove these.

I think Dr. Johnson (of Shakesphere’s era) was correct when he declared “The nature has given women so much power that the law has wisely given them very less”. But now, since the laws are also biased in favour of women, and since the laws of nature haven’t changed much, evidently it is of no surprise that men are victims but consided culprits not only by others (both men and women) but also by themselves.

We can clearly see that most people don’t think independently. The effect of this may be seen with reference to these facts:

(1) Some people tell that women are discriminated by men because “female infanticide death rates are high”. What is really true is that “it is better to be murdered while one is a feotus than to suffer the whole life of of harassment”. So the truth is that “being a female is good for themselves, but males are there for the good of others”. If female numbers go low, men will be the victims because they will only find it difficult to find a girl to marry. ONE NEEDS REALLY AN INDEPENDENT THINKING TO REALIZE THIS, BUT JUST A SIMPLE INDEPENDENT THINKING IS ALSO SUFFICENT TO PROVE THIS.
(2)I don’t tell that women are never harassed by men. I have indicated this in my previous blog like “Although it cannot be denied that there is discrimination of women by men sometimes, that fact may not be sufficient enough to neglect these following facts which imply obvious discrimination against men”.
(3) Dowry is given by girls’ “father” not earned by her “mother or herself”. Also, if a girl is harassed for dowry her father also feels as much sad as (if not more) her mother and in many cases he only has to earn and look after her. THIS IS THE CASE BOTH IN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS.
(4) Nobody jumps into funeral fire nowadays. WE HAVE SEVERAL CASES WHERE THE SOLDIERS WERE TORTURED FOR SEVERAL DAYS AND KILLED (LIKE INDIAN SOLDIES CAUGHT BY PAKISTANI’S AND BANGLADESHIS A FEW YEARS AGO. These numbers are much more than the total number of “jumping into funeral fire of husbands”. And the wives of the soldies mentioned above, also marry sometimes. Even if they remain in white sarees for life, is it not right considering the pain their husbands have undergone?
If one argues that “jumping into fire” was more common in older days, one can also see that the number of men who were given heinous tortures were also much more in older days.
If one argues that “torturing is only for a few days; but living in white sarees is life long”, in that case female infanticide is nothing wrong when babies are “just killed” when they are “just very young”.
(5) Also, I know that a Kanpur court had ordered a monthly compensation by his wife for an unemployed man divorced by his wife. But these cases are rare and many a times men don’t get justice in these cases. Of course women also dont get justice in all the cases. “I DO AGREE (AS I HAVE MENTIONE IN MY PREVIOUS BLOGS ) THAT EVERY COIN DOES HAVE TWO SIDES BUT WHAT I STRESS IS ONLY ONE SIDE IS BEING SEEN BY ALL MEN AND WOMEN AND HENCE THESE “”"”REASONABLE”"”" PEOPLE DO DO BELIEVE THAT THE COINS HAVE ONLY ONE SIDE. MY INTENTION IS TO TELL PEOPLE THAT THE COINS DOES DOES AND DOES HAVE TWO FACES AND I KNOW THAT ONLY PEOPLE WHO ARE “”"”"”"”REASONABLE”"”"”"”" CAN REALIZE THIS. AS I HAVE MENTIONED IN MY PREVIOUS BLOG, THE PEOPLE WHO CONSIDER THEMSELVES AS STARS (LIKE POLITICANS (PROBABLY LAWYERS ALSO?)) WON’T EASILY AGREE TO ALL THESE. WORST OF ALL, EVEN THOUGH I CAN CONVINCE ABOUT THESE THINGS TO ANYBODY, MAYBE AFTER GIVING MUCH EXPLANATIONS AND EVIDENCES, I DON’T HAVE TIME FOR THESE THINGS LIKE “FEMINISTS” WHOSE HUSBANDS USUALLY EARN ASTRONOMICAL SALARIES ENABLING THESE “FEMINISTS” TO ONLY FIGHT FOR “WOMENS’ GROUPS”, WITHOUT DOING ANY OTHER WORK.
(6) THE OBVIOUS PREREQUISITE WHILE DEALING WITH THE CURRENT NOTIONS AND VALUES IN THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY IS TO HAVE INDEPENDENT THINKING WHICH IS UNBIASED, UNSHAKABLE AND NOT INFLUENCED BY THE “ACCEPTED NORMS” OR “”CONTEMPORARY REFEREE PEOPLE”". YOU SHOULD NOT STICK TO “MODERN SUPERSTITIONS” OR “CONTEMPORARY SUPERSTITIONS”
AND WE SHOULD KNOW THAT OUR CONSCIENCE IN ITS PUREST FORM IS THE BEST JUDGE.

TRUTH WILL CONQUER IF IT IS TRUE THAT ONLY TRUTH CAN CONQUER.
GO BY YOUR CONSCIENCE; NOT OTHERS’
THINK INDEPENDENTLY ON YOUR OWN WITHOUT EXPECTING ALL THE EDIDENCES , EXPLANATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS FROM ME (I HAVE NOT TAKEN ANY RESPONSIBILITY FROM GOD OF SAVING MALES; ALL (BOTH MALES AND FEMALES) ARE EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE); ANYWAY THE CONSCIENCE, THE BEST JUDGE IS ALWAYS WITH YOU!
ALWAYS GIVE “YOUR OWN” COMMENTS WHICH AGREE WELL WITH YOUR CONSCIENCE;DON’T BOTHER ABOUT OTHERS’ COMMENTS.

I thank all who commented my earlier blogs favourably; I am extremely happy that at least there are some people in the world who can really think independently, who can follow their conscience to know what is right!

Thank you very much for reading my blog!!!

Time for men to fight for their rights? (Please read until end; I am sure it will be interesting)

We continually and continuously come across opinions (both by men and women) which always intend to publicize the so called fact that women are discriminated by men. This so called fact is mainly promoted by mass media (like TV, newspapers, magazines). The persons behind this are women who call themselves revolutionists (or who always like to revolt over helpless people) and men who think that they are heroes (politicians also fit into this category). Although it cannot be denied that there is discrimination of women by men sometimes, that fact may not be sufficient enough to neglect these following facts which imply obvious discrimination against men. Of course, people may not agree to this only because many a times people do not think independently but their thinking, ideals and ideas are directly affected by the contemporary society and mass media; at any time in history, only ideas which were considered "really real" by the contemporary societies have been accepted as "real, rational, scientific, good, healthy"; but later even after these "really real" so called facts got proved false, "modern superstitions" (which were considered "really real" by the next contemporary society and also considered "real, rational, scientific, good, healthy" by this society) have always replaced the "old superstitions" ( which were considered "really real" by the earlier contemporary society and which were also considered "real, rational, scientific, good, healthy" by that society).

Now let us look at these facts which reflect obvious discrimination against men:-

(1) According to contemporary society, men should marry at middle ages (not during youth) while only women can marry during youth. Men should be "settled" while marrying; while women can just "eat, chat and sleep" men should "work, work and work". If man is comparatively less active than woman (because of age) it is called "lack of manliness"; If an unmarried man runs behind a woman it is "indecency"; if an unmarried woman runs behind a man it is "equality". We are "whole hearted" to forgive any adultery by women while we (both men and women) roar at men for the slightest indecency; actually there should be more forgiveness towards men because they spend their youth unmarried (while they are more prone to make "mistakes").

In an ideal society, the minimum age for marriage should be the same for both men and women.
It may be 16 years, 18 years and at the maximum 20 years. (The idea that man should be older than woman is not supported by science; human beings are "young and youthful" at the age of 18, according to any scientific opinion; and the so called "early marriage" doesn't have any bad effects (physical, mental or emotional). If there is any problem, it is only because of the foolish society and because of the ignorant culture.
If one is worried about population explosion, the "minimum age for getting children" may be introduced and it may be set for a higher age.

(2) Governments have made rules which give equal rights for male and female children over the ancestral property; it is right. But there are societies which are matriarchal and traditionally all properties used to be transferred from mother to daughter (instead of the well known father to son property transfer). Now, in such cases, isn't it right to give the share of the ancestral property for the male children also?

(3) There should be equal punishment for equal crimes; women are easily forgiven.

Everybody agrees that almost always, culprits are just puppets in the hands of situations. Men are prone to be involved in more crime just because that is the situation created by the society (like men have to rear the whole family; he has to meet unrealistic demands of his wife; otherwise he will be considered waste;

he has to fight with other men;

he has to fight with women who fight for "equality").

Since women do not have all these troubles, it is natural to expect them to be "fair". But the fact is that men get several cruel, inhumane, unimaginable types of punishments like: rollers, aeroplanes, tensioning the body, crushing the body parts, beating with a club with all the strength (sometimes simultaneously by several people for too long), stripping, sexually humiliating etc.. We hear about several custodial deaths also. No such punishment for women involved in similar crimes even though they should not have involved in the crime since they should be less prone to make such crimes as explained above (like comparatively less family responsibility etc.).

If one thinks about the well being of the entire human population, such torture of anybody (men or women) is not correct. But if one thinks only from the "feminine" point of view, one should agree that women involved in such crimes should also be tortured the same way. This is unimaginable, right? This itself is a reflection of our contemporary values; we are always perfectly biased towards women (although we always perfectly argue the opposite). I think even in history we can't find any such heinous torture against any single woman while the deadly torture against captivated soldiers (all men) has been very common all the time.

(4) Feminists talk about "women discriminated at some point in history". But who fought thousands of wars in history? Who got killed, beheaded, stoned, mutilated? Who lost arms, legs, eyes etc.? Who became handicapped life long or died in the battle field without anyone to treat or food? Who got caught by the enemy and got tortured? Whom the kings used to punish more? Men or women? I think all the people put to cross (during olden ages) were men only. I think all the people who were split into two pieces alive (as was done as a part of a punishment) were men. Nobody bothers about the state of men during a particular time and region while talking about the state of women (may be bad) of that time and of that region.

(5) Women are put in comfortable positions and are paid well while their husbands do strenuous jobs. Women are paid more compared to the work they do. Still a woman claims that she is well above her husband if her salary is 30% of her husband's salary; she becomes formidably dominating. Her husband has to put 8 times effort (compared to her effort) to earn "just" 3 times her salary, but he will only be dominated after returning home.

Considering this, I think it is not improper to say "Why can't women be put in works like army, truck drivers, coolies, earth digging, working under the sun, cleaning jobs, cleaning gutters, railway track maintenance, employing as police, watchman, railway track police, traffic police, auto driver, night duties, lorry cleaners, suppliers, cleaners and dish washers in restaurants, cleaners in restaurants, laundry personnel, shopkeepers (night also), cooks, workshop work, garage work, lineman (electric & phone), manufacturing industries etc.?"

Again, there should equal salary for men and women for similar work

(6) Since women from socially and economically forward families have many advantages over and above men from the same class, in these cases, men also should have equal right to divorce. There are hundreds of instances where women have divorced their husbands "just for change" while the husbands were caring, loving and good. The reasons for these divorces were something like: "I want to mingle with people while he doesn't" or "I want to watch movies in the weekends while he prefers to go for a trip" etc.. It is a sad thing that men are not free to divorce even if they have much more serious reasons for seeking that.

(7) A man is made to give monthly compensation to his former wife after divorce (if approved); similarly, women who seek divorce for the reasons like the ones mentioned above should be made to give monthly compensation to the man. The only strength men have above women is a little more muscle power and in the modern world, muscle power doesn't have value and in no way it can equal the money power.

(8) All the family responsibilities are always on the men; women are care free; they only know how to blame their husbands; only know how to talk about "equality of women with men". All these cause a lot of pressure to men. Women also should take "responsibility"; not just want to have "authority".

(9) As explained in (8) above, men have responsibilities. Also they have problems explained in (5). Then is it not terribly unfair against men to fix a lower tax limit while women enjoy tax exemption unto a higher limit? ( Infact, they really "enjoy" with this "extra" money instead of supporting the family with this money as against men who struggle to manage their families with what "little" money they have)

(10) In a child's birth certificate, marks card etc., in addition to father's name, there should be mother's name also. If any woman divorces a man with reasons like those mentioned in (6), if the couple has a child, the woman should also take up the responsibility of bringing up the child; not just the man should be made responsible for the child, in that case.

(11) Male police do not usually handle women; they call women police. In that case, isn't it wrong if women police question a man?

(12) What I will tell now may be amusing; but a great saying goes something like this: " Everything that is original seems amusing or silly at first look", or, "Anything which is not considered silly at first cannot hope to become a revolutionary idea". I think the following are necessary at least to bring confidence in men; to understand that they also have the right for a happy life; to accept that

"Men and women of similar status have not been equal" or "A woman is put much more superior compared to a man of the same status, at least in the contemporary society if not by the earlier societies also ";

to think that there can be "men point of view" also; to be able to free themselves from the perpetual women dominance both at work and at home; to be able to think independently and freely.

These are:

- Men schools, colleges, hostels (just like women only schools etc.)
- Special buses (men only)
- Seat, compartment reservations for men- women to be punished if entered inside these (in the same way men are punished if they enter into women's compartments)
- Special queues for men also
- Providing privacy for men also:- rooms in bus stations (men's rooms) etc., "men's talk", to go fully inside a house
- Equal right to select a spouse
- Men counseling, sex education, psychological help
- Recognition, counseling, development, help, supporting male prostitutes
- Improvement in men's dresses:- both outer and inner
- Men helpline, men's groups, men right activists
- But this "masculism" (as I called it) should continue only until men really get justice. If at all it is ever achieved (For 99.99999999%, it is impossible in this universe), then everybody should become "humanists". The ultimate goal of everyone should be to get justice and happiness for all (irrespective of whether one is a man or a woman). One should never try to imitate the ideology of feminists who believe that "Women should get justice and happiness and "only women should get justice and happiness"".

(13) Now, I am sure that you are convinced at least on some of the points. But you remain quiet, you won't share this blog with anybody, you will fear whether you will be considered crazy if you agree to accept the truth in this blog (although your heart tells that this "may" be right). This is just the proof that the contemporary people (both men and women) are unavoidably biased towards women (anyway this is a "modern superstition" supported by mass media and "beliefs" or "misbelieves" of the contemporary society). So, since you are biased towards women, I think you dare not put a comment for this blog ..

sigh sigh ..sigh .sigh sigh sigh ..sigh .sigh sigh ..