rediff.com
Skip to content


Maharashtra Govt lets Lavasa & Amby Valley piss into Pune’s water-supply

Dear Mr & Ms Citizen,

Remember the Hindi films where the village police inspector trembled before the powerful zamindar who twirled his handlebar moustache and boasted, “Kanoon? Kaun sa kanoon? Yahaan ka kanoon main hoon!” In the 21st Century, companies like Sahara Amby Valley Corporation and Lavasa Corporation are the new zamindars. Unlike moustache-twirling landlords, these corporations have a friendly image, thanks to savvy PR-handling. But make no mistake, they are feudal in nature. The Sahara Group and Hindustan Construction Company (which is behind Lavasa township) bend political leaders, bureaucrats and governments to do their bidding. They go where no builder has gone before, and do what no builder has done before.

In the last decade, while you were dreaming of the perfect home built amidst beautiful lakes and forests, these companies were busy negating your Constitutional rights, stealing your public land and cornering your precious water resources. Although the Constitution gives you the right to travel freely throughout India, outsiders who go to Amby Valley and Lavasa are virtually on a short-duration visitor’s visa. Although these cities stand on lands that the government gifted them practically free-of-cost, they are guarded like nuclear installations. Few people are even aware of where exactly Amby Valley is, and even fewer have been there. It is easier to go to army cantonments!

“GATED TOWNSHIPS” — GHETTOS OF THE SUPER-PRIVILEGED. Amby Valley and Lavasa are like “gated communities” common in countries like Mexico, Brazil and Argentina. They are ghettos of the super-rich and super-privileged. The growing gap between the ordinary people (earning monthly incomes in thousands and tens of thousands) and the super-rich people (earning in lakhs and crores) is creating a social phenomenon where the super-rich wish to retreat into cities created exclusively for them, motivated by fear of attacks and robberies and a desire to live in a five-star environment. They gladly sacrifice the right of self-government by letting a corporate entity own and manage the city. Question is: do we want India to develop like Brazil and Argentina, where the poor are routinely segregated and kept out by high walls and armed security guards? [Read about the drawbacks of gated communities in different countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gated_community ]

WITH WATER-CRISIS LOOMING, GHETTOS ARE FORMING AROUND WATER SOURCES: Amby Valley and Lavasa are not the only townships built around lakes. Another ghetto is being planned around the Mulshi dam on the Mula river near Pune. The State govt recently sanctioned 5,952 acres of land to be turned into Lavasa-like city, five kilometres from Amby Valley. The Urban Development Department issued a notification (1810/1551/pc2383/2010/ud-13) on October 21, 2010, which was published in the gazette on October 28. The notification said that the land of Saltur, Majgaon, Barpe, Bhambarde, Ekole, Gutke and Adgaon villages would be included, although the villages core (gaothan) would be excluded. Land acquisition is already happening.

ALLOWING GHETTOS AROUND RESERVOIRS MEANS HANDING OVER INDIA’S WATER RESOURCES TO THE SUPER-PRIVILEGED. In the coming decade, water scarcity is expected to reach crisis proportions, and may create civil-war like situations. At a time like this, permitting such ghettos is a mala fide act. According to our Constitution, the owner of all natural resources, including water resources, is the Union of India. Private entities can’t own lakes, rivers etc. However, Lavasa Corporation exercises ownership rights over the entire upstream area of the Warasgaon dam – one of the three sources of water-supply to Pune. Lavasa has permission to build 10 lakes (i.e. 10 check-dams) on the tributaries bringing water into Warasgaon reservoir. Each lake will take away roughly one-tenth of the 11 tmc (i.e. thousand million cubic feet) of water that Warasgaon currently supplies to Pune. The first lake of Lavasa project – Dasve lake – is complete, and it has taken 1.03 tmc.

PUNE CITIZENS: LAVASA IS PISSING IN YOUR WATER-TANK. HOW DO YOU FEEL? Nestled in a cosy valley, Lavasa is consuming the water-supply of Pune, and discharging sewage into the same valley. In the dry seasons, maybe the sewage is contained in tanks and prevented from your reservoir, but please think: What happens in the monsoons? Bear in mind that the standards and equipment for handling sewage are self-determined and self-monitored by Lavasa Corporation. There is no external regulatory mechanism.

PUNEITES, WERE YOU CONSULTED BEFORE MAHARASHTRA GOVT. TOOK THE DECISION TO ALLOW THIS GHETTO AROUND YOUR WATER-SUPPLY? Did they invite your objections before taking this decision affecting you? If not, why are you quiet? With only a couple of pages of blanket permissions and “temporary NOCs”, the Congress & NCP state government gave Lavasa Corporation the right to develop about 25,000 acres around Pune’s water-supply reservoir. It practically gifted 348 acres of prime land in the catchment area on a 30-year lease, at a paltry rent of about Rs 2.7 lakh per annum.

PLUS, THERE’S MASSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO THESE VALLEYS AND THE FORESTS. Activists of NAPM (National Alliance for People’s Movements) and Anna Hazare have raised strenuous objections on the basis of environmental damage. But, sometime this week or next week, it is likely that Union Minister of State for Environment & Forests (MOEF) Jairam Ramesh will give Lavasa Corporation the go-ahead, stating that it has not caused “substantial deforestation” or “loss to environment”. In doing so, he will be overlooking evidence that is obvious to the casual onlooker. See these photos: http://tinyurl.com/lavasa-pix  

PLUS, THEY HAVE BEEN HOODWINKING FARMERS. Over the last decade, Lavasa Corporation, by fair means and foul, quietly acquired farmers’ land, including adivasi land, by the “creeping acquisition” method, while the State government looked the other way and twiddled its thumbs. NCP Chief Sharad Pawar, as well as Ajit Pawar (nephew) and Supriya Sule (daughter) were hands-on in this process of land acquisition and getting permissions.

LAW-AND-ORDER ISSUES ARE HUSHED UP. On 10 December 2010, an MNC executive who was attending a conference at Amby Valley was raped in her room. Her complaint was registered by Paud Police Station in Pune, 40-50 km away. Why, Sir? Are there no local police stations at Lonavla or Khandala, much closer to Amby Valley? Sahara Amby Valley, a subsidiary of Sahara India Group, issued a statement to the media: “Prima facie it appears their internal matter where an employee of a private company is alleged to have been physically assaulted during their corporate conference. It was reported that a formal complaint was registered with CEO Amby Valley, Vivek Kumar.” Henh? Since when did such corporations start taking criminal complaints and issuing statements? Do you recall any hotel CEO doing something similar? Well, this just goes to show how entities like Sahara and Lavasa are blurring the lines between being state players and private players.

THESE GHETTOS ARE EFFORTS TO CREATE STATE-WITHIN-STATE ENTITIES – A SORT OF NAXALISM WITH MONEY & POLITICAL POWER. Until a few days back, I felt that Lavasa township was not something I needed to worry about. I thought it was just an issue involving some forest-land, a little bit of environmental degradation and a few adivasi farmers being exploited. “So what?” I thought, “Why should I bother? Let others fight on this issue.” But now I realize that much more is at stake. The basic structure of our country’s governance is being altered. Despite their tall claims of about Lavasa being a city for all socio-economic classes, it is clearly intended for widening the gap between the haves and the have-nots. This is a form of apartheid, and in fact, a negation of our Constitution. The Constitution envisages cities and villages governed by elected representatives; it does not envisage gated townships run by companies. If we allow this to continue, we will soon see large private enclaves carved out of our nation, where even police, army and government officials will have to seek permission to enter – a full-fledged state-within-state.  

Experts worldwide see gated townships as a negation of urban values, polarizing society, breeding fear and discrimination. Such townships are a form of apartheid, and worse, naxalism – where a combination of money-power, influence, outright corruption and legal wizardry are used for seceding from the nation. Mr and Ms Citizen, let us nip this aberration in the bud!

•    Please study this issue further: http://tinyurl.com/lavasa1

•    Register your protest by writing to Chief Minister, Prime Minister and NAC Chairman Sonia Gandhi. Download draft of letter: http://tinyurl.com/Lavasa-letter

•    Email Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh and tell him what you think! Click on http://moef.nic.in/modules/contact-ministry/contact-ministry/

Warm Regards,
Krish
98215 88114

Posted in Activism, Economic Commonsense, Global stupidity, Governance & Administration, Politics, Right to Information, RTI Act 2005.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .


One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Nandini Pandit says

    I don’t really agree with you. Firstly, Lavasa is not a gated community. Secondly, Pune doesn’t really get any water supply from Warasgaon lake. Thirdly, Lavasa has done a lot of good and positve development in that area. Older era zameendars never really gave back to the society the way Lavasa has done. Because of this project, locals have access to good roads, electricity, clean drinking water, gas, housing, sanitation, employment opportunities, and above all free and good quality education for their children!

    They have also done a very good job at making that place green and environment friendly. When development takes place in existing cities and trees are cut, no one says anything! But here they are pointing fingers and that too these are unwarranted. That place is so green!

    It’s also not a city for the rich! It caters to all socio-economic classes.

    Here is a wonderful blog, I came across –

    Tarun Surana’s Blog: http://tarunsurana.blogspot.com/2011/01/lavasa-or-lonavala.html

    Lavasa or Lonavala??
    Lavasa, is no more a name which most people are not aware of. Following environmental ministry’s objections over Lavasa, which is the first attempt to build a planned city in the ‘free India’ (We had planned cities in India like Chandigarh, but that was pre-independence era. However, work at Lavasa is stuck after MoEF’s notice for over 2 months now.

    Lavasa, promoted by Hindustan Construction Company (HCC) is going through many controversies. It’s owners included names like Mr. Sadanand Sule, ‘Son in-law’ of NCP leader Mr. Sharad Pawar in 2003-04 and why not, who in this country can claim to successfully acquire 20,000 acres without help from ‘politicians’. After all, Lavasa needed huge tracts of land as the dream was to build a city, and not a small ‘row houses’ project. Look at the mess at all big cities in India. Traffic, water supply, sanitation, green cover(?), open spaces(??)…Lavasa was dream of building a city where these issues are taken care of by intense urban planning.

    Because of sheer size, the project has come in the eyes of MoEF. If Lavasa would not have been a single project under one identifiable promoter, i guess there wouldn’t have been any issues!! Just look at Lonavala, Shimla, Mussorrie or several other hill stations and the quantum of urbanization at these places (which is imminent!)

    There are hundreds of different projects offering apartments/villas/bungalow plots in the hills of Lonavala and no one bothers about the traffic, water supply and sustainable development. But, if someone dreams of creating planned urban space like Lavasa…MoEF says…You can’t do it.

    I don’t understand which way one should go? Should India continue to build cities the way Mumbai, Lonavala, Shimla are built (unplanned, haphazard manner in which townships and projects are being launched) or should planned developments like Lavasa be given a chance to show a alternate model of development..

    The question in the end is which of the two are more dangerous kind of developments to environment…Lavasa or Lonavala? Which of the two appears to be more green, more planned, likely to put less pressure on resources, infrastructure and less hazardous…Lavasa or Lonavala??

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2014 Rediff.com India Limited. All rights Reserved.  
Terms of Use  |   Disclaimer  |   Feedback  |   Advertise with us