Skip to content


Taj Mahal—Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz’s tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of  Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz’s burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak’s inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term ”
Mahal ” has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . “The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.

Firstly, her name was never
Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ,” he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters ‘Mum’ from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.”Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale cre ated by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan’s time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan’s era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz’s death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death, also suggest the
Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan’s time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan’s time and are still inaccessible to the public
. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi’s government tried to have Prof. Oak’s book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak’s research.

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

Posted in Facts.



23 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. dev singh says

    Proves…history is always a mystery. Interesting read

  2. thedaddytiger says

    what is the use if it was someone elses” place not shahjahans what will happen if every one knows about it ………… i will tell you it will become a political agenda and will be destroyed same as babri masjid and will shed tears and blood out of so many innocent indians who are already paying there price of being the indian citizens and moreover what do you want i dont understand demolish taj mahal for what good sake……………..?????? never understood what taj mahal done to any one ??????? and i dont believe some people appreciating it ………………its not a mandir or masjid to be divided based on religion its a momument of love preserve it dont make it a hidutva ro political agenda………………. i request to the whole nation.

  3. RAMESH says

    fine good subject.

  4. nomenzone says

    let the sleeping dogs lie yaar…..y create d turbulence….!! what is more imp is dat “taj” really is beautiful n we r proud to have it…no..??

  5. Hellz Angel says

    yup… nyoo ths b4… juz 1 uf da thingz wich iz lft fo spekulashunz i gues… abt da ri8 — nice n simpl way uf ri8-in da faktz… infomativ… undrstud evrythin… peace!!!

  6. usha rani says

    hi,
    when hindu temples are usurped, hindu sentiments are hurt. similarly with any faith/religion. religion first of all as said by einstein is concerned only with evaluating human thought and actions; it is not qualified to speak of real facts and the relationships between them… i think we need not take to heart even if it may be true… many hindu temples are once upon a time -buddhist shrines. let us strive for peace! let us live by love and compassion…

  7. d says

    now this is interesting

  8. bizi nanda says

    very very problematic.Seems extremely politically motivated.We have enough bloodshed in the name of ram and rahim.Use your knowledge to build bridges and not divide

  9. Apratim Shaw says

    Democracy hai bhai ! Logic be damned. Good Post.

  10. chucky says

    Great blog……But i would not want that to be true.

  11. ekantapadhika says

    Kya bachche log….saare romance ko paani mein baha diya. Yeh padne ke baad, chaandni raat, haathon me haath…kya mazaa aayega?

  12. monu g says

    ditto vivek.. i guess even if the truth is as stated wd it be so easily accepted without becoming a political agenda.. lest it might face the same destiny as Babri masjid.. then not only India but the World wd lose one of its greates marvels.. I guess if the truth brings out bitterness, let it remain concealed…

  13. ANWESHA says

    if this is true, then it is very shocking. even though everyone does want the truth, i cant help feeling that it a truth best left buried.

  14. Richard says

    Hi,

    I like this piece as it is very different to what I found thus far. If you have any more such information I would appreciate you posting it or emailing it to me. How did you find this ? Excellent work.

  15. Gordhan says

    excellent one yar………….nice

  16. dhrubo says

    Why cant the Govt do some thing this.

  17. DURGA says

    Hai, very well, whatever u brought in front of us is good thing, all should know about this, just find out like this more to educate the people of our wonders.

  18. BEST FRIEND says

    if this is the truth, it should be bought out in the open particularly to the attention of Hindutva parties who can then push the government to take the necessary steps to verify the authenticity of the information given over here.

  19. vivek says

    U r correct when u hint at bringing the fact out , whatever it may be , but the bigger question is ?Do we ,as a citizen of india are matured enough to understand and accept truth in its reality without indulging in riots; we become overwhelmed with negative emotions when such things are brought forth resulting in disharmony and deaths of the innocents ; do we want to bring out the truth at the cost of human lives and national disintegration…

  20. simha chalam says

    Oh Gosh, wat a fact.. this REALLY must be brought out as, I am sure, 95% of the people don”t know this fact

  21. sonam says

    wow, is it really so, I can”t believe it , a very nice and informative post thanks for sharing it with us

  22. INDER VIG says

    yes you are true here,,,,,i have also read it when the paper was published earlier,,it is a well known fact but still remains unacknowledged.

  23. Sensible Joker says

    Very nice post, very informative. Points are quite reasonable too. Maybe this is the reality. But who will induce the govt. for further investigations?